|
|
|
|
 |

July 19th, 2004, 02:13 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right?
Quote:
Originally posted by Boron:
the special mictlan pretenders like lord of the night don't spread dominion.
|
This is incorrect. All Mictlan pretenders spread dominion, regardless of what type they are.
Quote:
|
i read somewhere that the prophet spreads dominion too for mictlan .
|
The prophet does not. You can check this by simply right-clicking on any of your temples.
|

July 19th, 2004, 02:15 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right?
Quote:
Originally posted by tinkthank:
Thanks much sir.
So the capital does not, the prophet does not, and the temples do not, but the pretender does (at the normal rate). Good to know!
|
The pretender does not spread at the normal rate. The pretender spreads with a single full-strength temple check every turn, while all other pretenders get two full-strength temple checks, and one check as a regular temple.
|

July 19th, 2004, 02:17 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right?
Thanks Graeme.
|

July 19th, 2004, 11:29 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right?
Quote:
Originally posted by Graeme Dice:
quote: Originally posted by tinkthank:
Thanks much sir.
So the capital does not, the prophet does not, and the temples do not, but the pretender does (at the normal rate). Good to know!
|
The pretender does not spread at the normal rate. The pretender spreads with a single full-strength temple check every turn, while all other pretenders get two full-strength temple checks, and one check as a regular temple. Elaborate please Graeme. What did you mean by full-strength temple check vs regular temple check?
|

July 19th, 2004, 11:37 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right?
Quote:
Originally posted by Stormbinder:
Elaborate please Graeme. What did you mean by full-strength temple check vs regular temple check?
|
A full-strength temple check is the same thing as a temple check at a dominion strength of 10. A regular temple check is a temple check at your current dominion strength. I believe that each pretender gives two dominion 10 checks, and one check at their current dominion strength.
|

July 20th, 2004, 10:42 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right?
Quote:
Originally posted by Graeme Dice:
quote: Originally posted by Stormbinder:
Elaborate please Graeme. What did you mean by full-strength temple check vs regular temple check?
|
A full-strength temple check is the same thing as a temple check at a dominion strength of 10. A regular temple check is a temple check at your current dominion strength. I believe that each pretender gives two dominion 10 checks, and one check at their current dominion strength. Ok, thank you. Do you know by any chance what type of progression is there between temple strength and dominion checks? For example - how much better full-strength temple check that, let's say, strength 1 temple check?
Personally I don't think it is linear, so stength 10 dominion check is not likely to be 10 times better than strength 1, based upon my observation. Does anybody happens toknow some numebrs/formulas for temple checks?
|

July 20th, 2004, 02:39 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Mictlan dominion spread: Did I get it right?
Quote:
Originally posted by Stormbinder:
Ok, thank you. Do you know by any chance what type of progression is there between temple strength and dominion checks? For example - how much better full-strength temple check that, let's say, strength 1 temple check?
|
Haven't you read the dominion guide? It's located here.
Quote:
|
Personally I don't think it is linear, so stength 10 dominion check is not likely to be 10 times better than strength 1, based upon my observation. Does anybody happens toknow some numebrs/formulas for temple checks?
|
Dominion strength of 1 is succesful 10% of the time. Dominion strength of 10 is successful 100% of the time.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|