|
|
|
 |

August 1st, 2004, 12:37 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bavaria , Germany
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: your favourite 2.12 vq nation
to be brief i only listed nations .
if i had listed all themes the number would have increased to about 25.
in question 1 + 2 you may chose as many answers as you want , in question 3 only 1 .
|

August 1st, 2004, 01:39 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: your favourite 2.12 vq nation
My favorite VQ nation is Marignon. 
__________________
Wormwood and wine, and the bitter taste of ashes.
|

August 1st, 2004, 01:52 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bavaria , Germany
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: your favourite 2.12 vq nation
Quote:
Originally posted by Cainehill:
My favorite VQ nation is Marignon.
|
lol
vq would fit great into diabolic faith but is not allowed 
|

August 1st, 2004, 02:04 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: your favourite 2.12 vq nation
VQ is still a viable choice. It is pricey though, so any nation which allows you to play w/ crap scales will be good.
|

August 2nd, 2004, 04:43 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hobart, Australia
Posts: 772
Thanks: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: your favourite 2.12 vq nation
I only ever take the VQ with BF Ulm because I think she's thematic for that race/theme.
__________________
There are 2 secrets to success in life:
1. Don't tell everything you know.
|

August 2nd, 2004, 05:13 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: your favourite 2.12 vq nation
Quote:
Originally posted by Zapmeister:
I only ever take the VQ with BF Ulm because I think she's thematic for that race/theme.
|
I agree with Zapmestier. VQ is still overpowered, if you know well how to design and play her, even after the Last patch - although it is now significantly better than before, thanks to devs. But it is indeed quite thematic for BF, and BF could use some boost. For all other themes I would frown on VQs in the games that I orginize/play.
|

August 2nd, 2004, 05:47 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bavaria , Germany
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: your favourite 2.12 vq nation
Quote:
Originally posted by Stormbinder:
quote: Originally posted by Zapmeister:
I only ever take the VQ with BF Ulm because I think she's thematic for that race/theme.
|
I agree with Zapmestier. VQ is still overpowered, if you know well how to design and play her, even after the Last patch - although it is now significantly better than before, thanks to devs. But it is indeed quite thematic for BF, and BF could use some boost. For all other themes I would frown on VQs in the games that I orginize/play. hm yeah for pan cw and the like the vq is still too good . almost 50% have voted that they build their nation around the vq and not the other way round .
perhaps that is really a sign that vq is still too good .
i like the vq a lot ( i started playing in 2.12 so i never saw a pre 2.12 vq ) but i have to admit that she really is a small bit too good still .
i have thought of how to make a lich ( for ryleh e.g. ) a semivq at least midgame but he would need so pricy equipment that it is not worth it .
with no regeneration + a dagger as starting weapon i think it is impossible to use him as an indyexpansion earlygame sc .
no other sc can be used as riskless for early game expansion because all others have either always the small risk to gain a really nasty battle affliction or they have recuperation / immortality but are otherwise too weak to be used as sc .
perhaps i should start a new poll asking about the vq , nerfing it down a little bit more by the following :
forbidding her for most nations . only allow her for thematic natioins :
pan cw , ermor , bf ulm , abysia .
at least disallow her for pythium , caelum , arco .
increase her path costs to 60 or 70 .
this way the basic high dominion , 2-3 E , optional 2-3 A , 2+D , 1+B , 2+ W vq will be really hard to pay for e.g. pythium/caelum and so still be worth it for ermor but not be imbalanced (+ very thematic ) .
but at the moment she still is perhaps a slightly too good pretender for the races which can afford lousy scales .
do you think i should try to make a new thread / poll which perhaps results in small changes which balance the vq even more ?
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|