Technology from captured facilities

Lucanos · #1 June 19th, 2001, 02:05 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Spoo:
Oh dear. I didn't know we had one of those...

Assume you have a 67 tons of squirrel

JenMax · #2 June 19th, 2001, 03:23 AM

yes, we do. They are called nuclear and biological weapons....

Jubala · #3 June 19th, 2001, 04:12 AM

quote:
Originally posted by JenMax:
yes, we do. They are called nuclear and biological weapons....

You forgot chemical. They're kind of nasty too.

[This message has been edited by Jubala (edited 19 June 2001).]

Instar · #4 June 19th, 2001, 05:01 AM

Well, if you're going for complete world vaporization, chemical munitions probably won't cut it. Biological weapons won't cause physical destruction, and there could possibly be survivors. Few, but some perhaps.

Spoo · #5 June 19th, 2001, 05:30 AM

quote:
yes, we do. They are called nuclear and biological weapons....

Ah, but could you coordinate their detonation in the case of an invasion? You'd need something along the lines of the Dooms-Day Machine from "Dr. Stangelove".

------------------
Assume you have a 1kg squirrel
E=mc^2
E=1kg(3x10^8m/s)^2=9x10^16J
which, if I'm not mistaken, is equivilent to roughly a 50 megaton nuclear bomb.
Fear the squirrel.

Phoenix-D · #6 June 19th, 2001, 06:48 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Spoo:
Ah, but could you coordinate their detonation in the case of an invasion? You'd need something along the lines of the Dooms-Day Machine from "Dr. Stangelove".

A few fusion bombs per facility would do the trick.. build them into the facility, then when invasion appears likely to succeed, set them off... no need for them to go off at the same time, just as long as they get triggered in time.

Phoenix-D

Taqwus · #7 June 19th, 2001, 02:51 PM

Wouldn't that cause one heck of an unhappiness modifier, 'tho?

------------------
-- The thing that goes bump in the night