But do you really like SC in dominions2 ?

[Oversway]

Some people like SCs, others do not. I'd say it is a matter of opinion. For me, there would be a nice balance of SC and regular armies.

I agree the unmodded game with defaults settings does seem to have a "race for the SCs" feel to it. However there are settings and mods that adress this.

[Thilock_Dominus]

I can't really say. I'm a single player dom2 user, so it doesn't bother me. I wouldn't have any Idea how a VQ in MP would be like.
Isn't there a simple anti-VQ strategy if you know your opponent uses VQ?

[The_Tauren13]

I think toning life drain down a bit, (which I believe I heard was in the books for Dom III ) would really help. SCs might still be possible, but quite a bit more difficult to get/use...

[BigDaddy]

I'd rather see SC's built by experience AND items rather than just items. It would require a more well developed leveling system though.

[liga]

Yes .. probably life drain need to be powered down ... but also I feel in great agreement with tinkthank about the fact that SC are also a lot unthematic ... a player making a VQ as her/his best SC could be of any theme/race ... and also all the air nations go to Air Queen and all the Blood Nations go for Ice Devils ...

It could be that the Ascension Wars are to be win by the God that is able to get soon the favors of this powerful beings, but I don't like that too much and anyway since my old years of Dungeons and Dragons I hate the powerful 20 level fighter who can survive killing thousands of goblins

... probably what is missing (in my opinion, of course) is a system making really easier to hurt someone if it is totally surrounded or something like that ...

So also a SC could have hard problem against 100 heavy infantry

anyway, good play to all
Liga

[WraithLord]

I think that hugh armies should be able to kill even the most potent SCs.
I think the game should enforce a set of penalties/rules to make sure that no solo unit can destroy armies made of many hundreds of units.

It gives a good rpg feel to "nurture" a SC and see how potent it becomes. But I think if most powerful units will have major impact in battlefields but are not a one unit army that rpg feel will stay without the SCs problems.

I've played any number of games where you conquer territory then raise taxes to build more armies to conquer more territory. For me, SCs and powerful magic are the key selling points for Dom2.

And when I've driven SCs, I've never felt completely comfident in their survival (against other players). There's always risk.

The reason people race for the unique SCs isn't that you lose the game without them (I've won games with national armies and national mages). It's that they're unique.

P.S. How often do VQs actually get played these days?

[liga]

P.S. How often do VQs actually get played these days?

I don't know ...anyway scripting invulnearbility, attack and than 3 x life drain is very difficult to stop for most of the nations

[Ironhawk]

The game does enforce a set of penalties which keeps solo units from wiping out entire armies. Namely: Fatigue and the -1 defense per attack after the first rule. Unfortunately, life drains drains both HP and fatigue so you are doomed anyway. Take away lifedrain and building an SC becomes more complicated.

izaqyos said:
I think that hugh armies should be able to kill even the most potent SCs.
I think the game should enforce a set of penalties/rules to make sure that no solo unit can destroy armies made of many hundreds of units.

It gives a good rpg feel to "nurture" a SC and see how potent it becomes. But I think if most powerful units will have major impact in battlefields but are not a one unit army that rpg feel will stay without the SCs problems.

[Yvelina]

Taking life drain without removing regeneration and reivigoration from items will not have much of an effect. It will certainly shift the balance of power, but it will not bring back any of the fun.