|
|
|
 |

August 15th, 2001, 01:53 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Elk River, MN, USA
Posts: 472
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Next Patch wishes....
Thought of another one - inclusion of formations in the xxx_AI_files, with making the position type work in restricting that formation position to certian types.
And, making the AI demand surrender/subjugation/etc... work, and enableing the pop. required for operating facilities.
|

August 15th, 2001, 01:53 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Next Patch wishes....
quote: nature shrines should get back their system wide abilities, pleeeaaase
Um, they do have system wide abilities... at least AFAIK (v1.35). I'm playing a "finite" resources game, and with a nature shrine in my home system I get the bonus to all planets.
In fact, with a nature shrine III, my homeworld gets 3,000 *0.03 = 90K resources per year. I dig only 13K out each turn with a monolith & mineral miner, so my homeworld's value is quickly rising to infinity 
In fact, it's even better than that, since I've got a pair of Value improvement plants 2. 3,000 * 0.07 = 210,000 of each resource each year.
And my resource increase goes up (ie. resource acceleration) by 15,000 each year! The power of compound interest is staggering...
But, that's even more off-topic.
__________________
Things you want:
|

August 14th, 2001, 03:01 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Next Patch wishes....
Tactical combat- "resolve combat peacefully" buttton.
Ship orders - "Wait X turns" option.
I have are plenty more but there's no point crying for all of them at once=-)
------------------
"Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
"I think so Brain but, if you replace the P with an O, my name would be Oinky, wouldn't it?"
|

August 14th, 2001, 04:06 PM
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kiel, Germany
Posts: 1,896
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Next Patch wishes....
Most of the improvements I would like to see involve the AI. In order of importance: - Captured planets and ships should be used by the Ministers.
- The AI should analyze/scrap captured ships.
- The bug in the research file should be fixed. So that the AI does not ignore the parameters anymore.
- The AI should stick to the research file and not make changes "of its own will" (i.e. research higher level of mines). At least the "mines override" should be limited to levels 2 or 3.
- The ability to construct a specific Ship type in the constructoin_vehicles file. Not just attack ship, but Attack Ship (A), Missile Ship, PD Ship etc. these types could be defined in the designcreation file.
- A new AI file that tells the AI how to put fleets together. For example: 2 Attack Ships (A), 3 PD ships, 5 missile ships, 2 carriers, 4 tankers.
- "Beware of strange warp points!" maybe the AI should heed its own advice a little better
. [/list]
Rollo
[edit]: forgot something
[This message has been edited by Rollo (edited 14 August 2001).]
|

August 14th, 2001, 04:25 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bordesholm, Germany
Posts: 781
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Next Patch wishes....
quote: Originally posted by suicide_junkie:
Quote:
nature shrines should get back their system wide abilities, pleeeaaase Um, they do have system wide abilities... at least AFAIK (v1.35) ...
|
...try it with v1.41 ...I was surprised also.
[This message has been edited by PsychoTechFreak (edited 14 August 2001).]
|

August 14th, 2001, 04:56 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,162
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Next Patch wishes....
AI diplomacy is still a bit odd.
For instance, an irritated AI might refuse a trade treaty -- even if it's subjugated right now. It's a touch odd, since the trade treaty is strictly better from its POV (at least, when the ratio is so large that the trade it would get dwarfs the resources that it produces by itself).
I'm tempted to think that as a measure of scorn, instead of refusing a gift, they could accept it and then discard it... or simply accept it, but basically ignore it for the purposes of relations.
The player should probably be told when one of his allies declares war, or has war declared on him.
AIs that are willing to surrender should be willing to enter into other treaties, as well, to end the war -- especially non-aggression and non-intercourse. Unless, of course, one wants to make an AI with a massive self-esteem problem... "Rule us! Rule us!"
AIs doing poorly in a war could consider asking their allies for help, specifying whether they need resources, or ships, or a DOW...
The state of war isn't particularly distinct from having no treaty/war. Possibly --
- aggression outside of war should hurt relations with everybody
- losses outside of war should have higher happiness penalties (especially, loss of colonies)
- a long war, perhaps, should cause happiness penalties (war fatigue)?
- increased maintenance costs during war
------------------
-- The thing that goes bump in the night
__________________
Are we insane yet? Are we insane yet? Aiiieeeeee...
|

August 14th, 2001, 05:20 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Next Patch wishes....
quote: Um, they do have system wide abilities... at least AFAIK (v1.35) ...
...try it with v1.41 ...I was surprised also.
I can't.
Thus, one big bug that needs fixing:
Communication Logs crash the game under WinME
Note: if I install 1.41 under Win98, SE4 works perfectly fine. WinME chokes every time.
EDIT: to fix quote
[This message has been edited by suicide_junkie (edited 14 August 2001).]
__________________
Things you want:
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|