New Screenshots are *sick!!!*

[GTKK]

The new screenshots look good, but almost a step back from the GUI of SE4 ... I'm thinking that will be modable.. so not a big deal i supose...

Space combat looks simply astounding. And very polished, sweet stuff.

One question that comes to mind is,,, With the Stars seemingly taking up more then one 'hexagon'.. Is it still going to be possible to travel through the stars space?... Like the Previous versions.. (which was a far-fetched concept scientificly... to begin with.. but who's counting)

I wonder how much harder it will be to create shipsets now? is Malfador going to come out with specifications in the near future.. does anybody know?

[Fyron]

GTKK said:
I wonder how much harder it will be to create shipsets now? is Malfador going to come out with specifications in the near future.. does anybody know?

Starfury is a good test bench for designing ships for SE5. If your ship models work in Starfury, they will probably work in SE5. I believe you might even be able to get custom ships to work in the Starfury demo. There was quite an extensive discussion recently about making models for SF/SEV over in *this thread*.

[Exan]

As for making ships to Starfury just ask, I can probably give some advices. I've addded almost every ship in TPM to the mod and they are working.(more or less)

[Randallw]

Yes, I recently managed to export my own x files to starfury. It's still early days, but by exporting my tutorial head from Gmax and renaming it as one of the starfury ships I can get it in Starfury as shown by the image I include. The glow in the head seems to be from an engine glow I can't change but it at least shows it can be done. Strangely the old x files seem to need an image overlaid over the model whereas mine can just be used with their original colours. I think perhaps because Starfury is old it needed textures for old directx.

[zircher]

The DirectX material template supports both kinds. Most modeller prefer textures and UV coordinates since they can add more detail to thir model without adding extra polygons. When you use colored polygons/faces you can only apply color to the whole polygon/face and not just part of it. So, it is an artistic choice and not a limitation of earlier version of DirectX.
--
TAZ

[Randallw]

Yeah, that's the other way I thought it was. Increased frame rate as it doesn't have to refresh extra polygons created just to have colour patterns.

Edit: great, I just realised I havn't finished the tutorials in Gmax yet and now I need to learn how to make skins to save polygons

[Hiruu]

The GUI could use some polishing, but I think the beta is going to hash out alot of those problems. A little off the topic of screenshots, but I've heard a little about the idea of individual leaders (heros), but has anybody heard of how it's going to be handled?

[douglas]

Going in order across then down:

1. Going back to SEIII's starting tech selection method rather than just low/medium/high is a good idea, and basing it on research cost instead of number of tech levels is a great improvement. Back in SE3 with just a few extra starting tech levels, I'd take Fighters 12 and start the game with fighters boasting more shields, CS, ECM, and firepower than most ships would have for quite some time. I hope the game host can specify the amount of starting RP's arbitrarily rather than selecting from a limited number of choices.
Hmm, cultural tech, I wonder how that works.

2. I see abstract "conditions" have been broken down into concrete aspects. I wonder if races will be able to have different optimal conditions, so how good a planet is depends on the race.
Planetary damage? Is that like SEIV's 10% value decrease from glassing? I assume it will be easier to repair damage than to improve the initial conditions/value.

3. Ship design obviously taken from Starfury. I hope the possible number and positioning of weapons, shields, armor, etc. aren't significantly dependant on shipsets. Otherwise, shipset design could become just another thing that needs to be optimized to be competitive. I wonder how much of Starfury's component damage model was also carried over.

4. It's nice to have government type actually affect the game, but I was hoping for something a bit more interesting and varied than this. Each government should have its own strengths and weaknesses, not just another point on the linear progression of perfectly corresponding bonuses and penalties.
Anarchy should not be a viable choice. Without government, how is a military going to get organized? Not to mention all the other public goods and services that a government can provide. Face it, there are some things essential to any large society's wellbeing and protection that the private sector simply will not provide without government regulation. This should be represented by many penalties far larger than a mere 8%, and I can't think of any logical reason for it to give any correspondingly large bonuses.

5. Eye candy, no big deal... except that we finally get to see directly how much damage a facility can take.

6. More options for victory conditions are good, but I hope we can edit all the numbers involved directly.

7. More eye candy. Should help make it successful in retail, but I don't particularly care very much about it.

8. Load and save entire game setups! Very nice. It looks like starting positions can be specified manually without editing the map, too.

[Renegade 13]

I suggested to Aaron today that some fans have been itching for some new screenshots...lets hope some more are put up soon.

[TNZ]

New screenshots in the SE5 Gallery.