|
|
|
|
 |

June 22nd, 2005, 05:21 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 511
Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Game: King of the Hill 2 (Open)
Quote:
Cainehill said:
Untrue. Some of us - like you and me - never got a chance to assault the hill earlier.
|
I wonder who prevented you from assaulting the hill earlier?
Quote:
Cainehill said:
Others who neighbored the hill ... pranced and flew about taking indies even after the matter had grown severe.
|
This is just low. I'd suggest that you avoid throwing provocative statements around.
I think that if we had started cooperating earlier we'd have had a better chance.
Griffin has done a fine job of securing the hill.
All that's left is to congratulate him.
|

June 22nd, 2005, 10:47 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 693
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Game: King of the Hill 2 (Open)
Yeah good job Ermor/Griffin!
|

June 22nd, 2005, 11:29 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Germany, Leverkusen
Posts: 262
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Game: King of the Hill 2 (Open)
Thank you all for your gratulations, this game was real fun to me(and the first one i won!)
My tatic was quite straight: i used the dragon to get as many indies in the bginning of the game as possible to ensure a constant stream of undeads and i chose that high domionion to force all my opponets to care on food.
I was a bit afraid of the pangae after i realized that he played as carnion woods(beacuse of his death magic).
Greets and thank you for all
Griffin, King of the Hill
|

June 22nd, 2005, 01:25 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 693
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Game: King of the Hill 2 (Open)
Your high dominion worked well, but food was a problem for me anyways, since the hill is surrounded by waste.
It seems to me your skeleton spamming helped you out a lot in those battles. The two bishops were good tactics as well.
|

June 22nd, 2005, 01:38 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Game: King of the Hill 2 (Open)
First victory? Congrats indeed!
__________________
Wormwood and wine, and the bitter taste of ashes.
|

June 22nd, 2005, 02:13 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 605
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Game: King of the Hill 2 (Open)
Meh, Carrion Woods sucks. Completely. I keep trying to make it work with different strategies and pretender designs, but the more I try to do anything with it, the more I start to think even base Ulm is better...
__________________
Every time you download music, God kills a kitten.
|

June 22nd, 2005, 02:36 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Game: King of the Hill 2 (Open)
I think the only redeeming feature of CW is the ability to kind of play them like Broken Empire: they can mix living troops and their undead minions without *too* much trouble (they have a fairly slow Dominion pop loss, 30.000 pop in the capital, and resources aren't really linked to population). Problem is, I don't think the undead troops are that good to warrant the trouble, and mages aren't the greatest thing in the world either.
It is possible to do very well with base Ulm (Entwined Destiny, if nothing else), but I have yet to see an example of Carrion Woods doing well in a game where more than one player is involved (a rush could work for them... maybe).
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|