|
|
|
|
| Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |

July 4th, 2005, 06:49 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 500km from Ulm
Posts: 2,279
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: SPMBT User Campaign - Silver Lions!
Quote:
Mobhack said:
Traditional - brick or stone or concrete built with substantiial ((tiled or slated) roofing on a substantial backing frame. tenement flats, old brick-works type factories, traditional farm steadings etc.
Modern - mainly glass, corrugated iron, aluminium or light "pressed stone" walling, and especially, light roofing (not walk-safe) such as flat tar-waterproofed or corrugated iron or similar roofing, on little or no backing frame which will tend to provide less protection from plunging arty and mortar fires. Modern estate housing, pre-fab housing, shopping strips, light industrial estate buildings, farm outbuildings etc.
|
Few "modern housing" then, as well, especially that far out "in the wild" 
Maybe this would "qualify" because of being mostly wood:
Farm houses, 400+ years
http://www.vogtsbauernhof.org/
Typical "land house" (>100 years old) will be timber-framed, often filled with quarrystone, or half-timbered like this:
http://www.carto.net/neumann/travell...chsenstadt.jpg
Some reconstructions have been made using bricks:
http://www.baudeck-leo.de/Fachwerkhaus-Rieth.jpg
Lots of old land and farm houses are made with very little timber frame. Walls are 30-40cm, roof is pan-tiled and walk (and tree-) save ...
http://www.spd-luecklemberg.de/_priv...hsteinhaus.jpg
A typical town house from 1900+ has 25-40 cm brick walls and pan tile roof, but wooden ceilings.
A typical post-war house (1945+) has thinner walls, but steel-reinforced concrete ceilings of 12cm+.
Bricks have become more and more lightweight through the years, though.
So, all in all, I think 95% of the qualifiy as "stone buildings". 
__________________
As for AI the most effective work around to this problem so far is to simply use an American instead, they tend to put up a bit more of a fight than your average Artificial Idiot.
... James McGuigan on rec.games.computer.stars somewhen back in 1998 ...
|

July 4th, 2005, 03:15 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SPMBT User Campaign - Silver Lions!
Battle 1 saves.
I agree with some of the previous comments with this battle.
found the enemy HQ so its not missing.
transporter slow but didn't move it much.
enemy FO was found at close range so I saw it before he fired.
__________________
Age and treachery will always beat youth and skill
|

July 4th, 2005, 03:17 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SPMBT User Campaign - Silver Lions!
battle 1 save.
__________________
Age and treachery will always beat youth and skill
|

July 4th, 2005, 03:22 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Battle 1 saves *DELETED*
Post deleted by Shadowcougar
__________________
Age and treachery will always beat youth and skill
|

July 4th, 2005, 03:25 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Battle 2 saves
battle 2
don't know why the paratroops came out of their postions.
HQ was in middle of map.
like some of mg post postions. they where tough
__________________
Age and treachery will always beat youth and skill
|

July 4th, 2005, 03:26 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Battle 3 saves
battle 3
Czechs have invented cloaking devices. don't know if its my game of the OOB.
__________________
Age and treachery will always beat youth and skill
|

July 4th, 2005, 03:29 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
BAttle 4
battle 4 saves.
found that that the D-65 unit had no Sabot or HEAT rounds. oopppss.
found out when D-65 couldn't kill a APC
__________________
Age and treachery will always beat youth and skill
|

July 4th, 2005, 04:53 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Crossville, TN
Posts: 1,189
Thanks: 21
Thanked 39 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
Re: BAttle 4
Quote:
Shadowcougar said:
battle 4 saves.
found that that the D-65 unit had no Sabot or HEAT rounds. oopppss.
found out when D-65 couldn't kill a APC
|
Oops! When I edited the unit and swapped out the main guns I forgot to resupply the ammo. It may only have HE because that is what the CEV unit has.
|

July 4th, 2005, 04:53 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Crossville, TN
Posts: 1,189
Thanks: 21
Thanked 39 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
Re: Battle 3 saves
Quote:
Shadowcougar said:
battle 3
Czechs have invented cloaking devices. don't know if its my game of the OOB.
|
The 1st couple were originally created in SPMBT 3.01 so it may have been a glitch that I missed in the conversion to WinSPMBT.
|

July 4th, 2005, 10:27 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Battle 3 saves
OK still was able to play
__________________
Age and treachery will always beat youth and skill
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|