As A Leader What Would You Do?

[Atrocities]

KlvinoHRGA said:
And how many people have to die in order to justify going after Iran in that matter Atrocities? In the case of nuclear weapons, preventative action is neccassary action. I think going into Iraq was a stupid idea because Iran is the bigger threat. Should've gone real WMD's in Iran instead of chasing phantom WMD's in Iraq.

I would hope that we would never have to go after Iran. And this is not a topic about Iraq or the mistakes made there.


As for the comment about Bush being a religious fanatic, well if you believe that then I have a small moon on the far side of Hellion to sell you.

[PDF]

I've no friendship for those fundamentalist freaks, but I'm rather thrown off by the whole thread subject
And so the totally faulty idea of "preventive action" is resurfacing, whoosh, some never learn ...
Also just remembered that normally everyone gang up against the MEGA EVIL EMPIRE !

[Atrocities]

And what makes a mega evil empire? In our case, the US would be that empire because we have the most points, not because of any leadership style or military might issue.

Running our own empires gives us a unique point of view that many arm chair warriors never get. We have run an empire so wee do know what a threat can and cannot be. As imperial leaders we have faced such challenges before and know that diplomacy is only one tool in our arsenal, a rather weak tool, and sometimes the best tool is simply to leave a threat alone to burn itself out.

Real world issues such as Iran do worry me, but like I said, I do not believe we have the right to tell them that they cannot have nukes when we have aloud North Korea and other nations that were once considered third world countries to have them. Now look at them.. Pakastand, India, and China are all economic power houses on the verge of super powers in their own neck of the world.

I hope that the leaders of Iran understand that there is more to life then killing.