|
|
|
 |

June 12th, 2006, 10:21 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Abandon SE4?Opinions:Space Empires 5 screen shots?
I noticed the "Intrepid" cruiser design shown seemed to be rated 1000 kT, and the components and armor seemed to add up to more than that.
|

June 12th, 2006, 10:25 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,624
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Abandon SE4?Opinions:Space Empires 5 screen sh
Quote:
PvK said:
I noticed the "Intrepid" cruiser design shown seemed to be rated 1000 kT, and the components and armor seemed to add up to more than that.
|
Nope, they add up to 1000. 
|

June 13th, 2006, 12:08 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Abandon SE4?Opinions:Space Empires 5 screen sh
I see "Cruiser (1,000 kT)" in the "Size" box, and then "Hull Structure" at "6475 kT" and "Armor" at "5380 kT", which add to 11,855 kT, no?
|

June 13th, 2006, 12:18 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: California, The United States of America
Posts: 252
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Abandon SE4?Opinions:Space Empires 5 screen sh
Quote:
PvK said:
I see "Cruiser (1,000 kT)" in the "Size" box, and then "Hull Structure" at "6475 kT" and "Armor" at "5380 kT", which add to 11,855 kT, no?
|
Yeah. This needs clarification on the game. I hope that there is not much questionable/ambiguous information like this throughout the game. Newbies (customers and future fans) will be even more confused.
-Wade
|

June 13th, 2006, 12:19 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,624
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Abandon SE4?Opinions:Space Empires 5 screen sh
How is it different from SE:IV? A cruiser of 500kT might have much more than 500kT of structure (i.e. hitpoints right?)
|

June 13th, 2006, 12:53 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,903
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Abandon SE4?Opinions:Space Empires 5 screen sh
I'm very happy to see that the component placement slots in the ship design do not have locations that depend on the shape of the top-down ship graphic.
Thank you Beta Testers for sorting out that one! 
|

June 13th, 2006, 02:02 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Abandon SE4?Opinions:Space Empires 5 screen sh
Quote:
Kamog said:
I'm very happy to see that the component placement slots in the ship design do not have locations that depend on the shape of the top-down ship graphic.
Thank you Beta Testers for sorting out that one!
|
I think that this needs clarification, Kwok said that its the ship summery? So does that mean the actual design is still like starfury? Or is it back to SEIV style??
|

June 13th, 2006, 08:07 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Abandon SE4?Opinions:Space Empires 5 screen sh
Right, as with SE IV armor has much higher 'damage' tonnage than 'weight' tonnage. Mounts also give weapons higher 'damage' tonnage than 'weight' tonnage.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|