|
|
|
|
 |
October 5th, 2006, 05:05 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvinkää, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Province Defense
Interesting, I wonder how hard it is for Caelum and stealth nations to overpower province defence now.
__________________
"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|
October 5th, 2006, 01:13 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Union, SC
Posts: 1,166
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Province Defense
PD 10 = 55 gold
PD 20 = 210 gold
PD 30 = 465 gold
PD 40 = 820 gold
__________________
Caduceus
|
October 5th, 2006, 03:28 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,449
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Province Defense
Quote:
Caduceus said:
PD 10 = 55 gold
PD 20 = 210 gold
PD 30 = 465 gold
PD 40 = 820 gold
|
The formula is (N^2+N)/2
__________________
I'm in the IDF. (So any new reply by me is a very rare event.)
|
October 5th, 2006, 03:42 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh, Bonnie Scotland
Posts: 226
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Province Defense
The increased income helps out with PD immensely. Playing EA Ulm, with scales granting a 10% bonus on income, I could easily field three armies (with commanders leading the maximum troops they could) and up almost all my PD to 50 while still having more than a thousand in the bank.
|
October 5th, 2006, 04:17 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Union, SC
Posts: 1,166
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Province Defense
Quote:
Agrajag said:
The formula is (N^2+N)/2
|
Sure, you could make it simple for me, but I enjoy calculating... No wait a second, I don't! Thanks!
__________________
Caduceus
|
October 5th, 2006, 05:12 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,449
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Province Defense
Quote:
Caduceus said:
Quote:
Agrajag said:
The formula is (N^2+N)/2
|
Sure, you could make it simple for me, but I enjoy calculating... No wait a second, I don't! Thanks!
|
Hehe, you're welcome 
Just remember that its only for raising from 0 to N, if you raise it from K to N it will be (N^2+N-K^2-K)/2 (which is the cost for going from 0 to N minus the cost for going from 0 to K)
Also, that formula is basic mathematics, I think I officialy learned that on the eighth grade (which means I could do it myself even before  )
__________________
I'm in the IDF. (So any new reply by me is a very rare event.)
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
