|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 20th, 2006, 05:23 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Woodland,CA 
						Posts: 918
					 Thanks: 14 
		
			
				Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Scientists create cloak of invisibility 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Randallw said: huh what? Unless you have more than one account you neither started nor posted in the other thread.
 
 |  Oops, my mistake -  I posted this one,OT: Scientists teleport two different objects , not the other. My bad.
 
Now, relax and take a very deep breath, letting it out slowly....   |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 20th, 2006, 09:39 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2004 
						Posts: 202
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Scientists create cloak of invisibility 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Black_Knyght said: 
 
	Oops, my mistake -  I posted this one,OT: Scientists teleport two different objects, not the other. My bad.Quote: 
	
		| Randallw said: huh what? Unless you have more than one account you neither started nor posted in the other thread.
 
 |  
 
 Now, relax and take a very deep breath, letting it out slowly....
   
 |  at least he got the either/or, neither/nor grammar rule correct.  that's a rarity. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 21st, 2006, 12:08 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Tasmania, Australia 
						Posts: 2,325
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Scientists create cloak of invisibility 
 Your critique is much appreciated. It is true that a quite extensive part of my personality is devoted to the application of appropriate grammer. 
Really I should have ascertained that he was referring to another thread seeing as how he was so adamant.
   |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 21st, 2006, 02:32 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Woodland,CA 
						Posts: 918
					 Thanks: 14 
		
			
				Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Scientists create cloak of invisibility 
 Don't take anything I said personal, I was just kidding around.
 I'd made a mistake, and you correctly caught it. No biggie.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 22nd, 2006, 09:37 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: San Diego, CA, USA 
						Posts: 731
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Scientists create cloak of invisibility 
 Nikola Tesla reportedly managed invisibility of an entire merchant ship, but the field effects on the crew were so severe that the idea was abandoned. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 22nd, 2006, 11:20 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2004 
						Posts: 202
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Scientists create cloak of invisibility 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Randallw said: Your critique is much appreciated. It is true that a quite extensive part of my personality is devoted to the application of appropriate grammer.
 
 Really I should have ascertained that he was referring to another thread seeing as how he was so adamant.
 
 
   
 |  *grammar
   |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 23rd, 2006, 12:01 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Tasmania, Australia 
						Posts: 2,325
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Scientists create cloak of invisibility 
 Thanks. I wasn't actually sure about that one. Usually if I am unsure I spellcheck it. Don't know why, but I simply didn't bother. 
I tend to be pretty OC about that. It annoys me no end the number of times I see people unable to differentiate between there, their and they're     
I saw a post recently where a person was complaining about foreign people asking for there (sic) version of something. I thought "well your concern would be more valid if you knew how to spell"   |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 23rd, 2006, 03:21 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 First Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: San Diego, CA, USA 
						Posts: 731
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Scientists create cloak of invisibility 
 That's life in the post-literate age   |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 22nd, 2006, 11:03 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Southern CA, USA 
						Posts: 18,394
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: OT: Scientists create cloak of invisibility 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Yimboli said: at least he got the either/or, neither/nor grammar rule correct.  that's a rarity.
 
 |  Eh? I rarely see anyone get that wrong? Maybe you just frequent too many FPS type boards filled with kids?   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		
		 Hybrid Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |