|
|
|
|
| Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |

January 29th, 2007, 11:44 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 104
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SK-105 probs
As I said already, I understand the game engine limitations. I might however make a scenario where the 17 rounds are the only ammo and a much higher ROF, just for kicks. Dumb question, but a turn is 30 seconds, right?
The enemy has nothing to say if they cannot see you
Don't understand about the smoke rounds, I am referring to 105mm smoke rounds, primarily used to spot targets for arty observers.
Now what about my question regarding APCR of 56 meaning what?
btw given that the "usual suspects" are all here i would appreciate help to my problem posted Post#http://www.shrapnelcommunity.com/threads/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=489854&page=0&view=collap sed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1
|

January 29th, 2007, 01:10 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 6,007
Thanks: 497
Thanked 1,956 Times in 1,263 Posts
|
|
Re: SK-105 probs
If you want to know the game basics, please refer to the Game Guide, introduction section (the first paragraph of text in the GG).
A sabot (AKA APCR) rating of 56 is 56cm penetration at the muzzle. SP games deal in centimetres. Details of the technical stuff can be found in the Mobhack help file. Penetration formulae cannot be published due to the original agreement with SSI, however.
As to your other post - perhaps someone with an interest in scenario design may answer that at some time. But your scenario should be OK, barring any major re-jigging of the OOBS in question. You may have to use scenhack (if a CD owner) or delete and repurchase some things if that happened. Best to make a backup, on the off chance.
Cheers
Andy
|

January 29th, 2007, 01:53 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 104
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SK-105 probs
cheers Andy, hope that the SABOT changes I mentioned can be made in a future release.
|

January 29th, 2007, 02:11 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 6,007
Thanks: 497
Thanked 1,956 Times in 1,263 Posts
|
|
Re: SK-105 probs
Please see the sticky post at the top of the forum about OOB error reporting/and or change request procedure.
This thread has become one of these involved, on and on ones, where there may be info in there but extracted in dribs and drabs. The thread here started before we published the standard - but needs to be put to bed & replaced with a proper format change request.
We need the error report laid out in that standardised format. You can already see several examples of folks reporting using this form. We also need some acceptable reference that backs up the report, and can be checked/verified.
Cheers
Andy
|

January 29th, 2007, 06:31 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,725
Thanks: 4,173
Thanked 5,972 Times in 2,930 Posts
|
|
Re: SK-105 probs
This has gone on too long . I am STILL waiting for an answer to the question I've now asked twice. ( and here's the third and final time ) WHICH of the many versions of this unit was the subject of the original post ?
I "think" we are discussing the Austrian OOB but as I said there are many others in the game and I want some clarifcation as my interest is starting to wane
And then this.......
Quote:
I have NO idea how the APCR is calculated (does that mean 560mm penetration?)and anyway it is probablly an error. The SK-105 Kurassier of the Austrian Army 1984 used the SABOT I talked about beforehand - the OFL-105-G1 with 550mm penetration at 1,700m - from 1981 onwards.
|
Yes a "56" means 560mm penetration so I wonder how that can be an error when you say the ammo used is rated at 550mm.
So far all I can see as a "problem" is that the weapon 103 gun with 56 penetration should be available starting with unit 8 not unit 9
Don
|

January 31st, 2007, 08:37 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 104
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SK-105 probs
Andy,
That's fair enough, I'll post a change request in the right format for collection.
Cheers,
S
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|