|
|
|
 |
|

September 4th, 2007, 11:47 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,355
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder Play By Email FAQ
Well... I'm going to stop accepting new players on Thursday.
Some people have mentioned certain mod nations, but no one has actually requested to play one themselves. So...
Velusion - Caelum. MrSparkle - Pangaea. Janlm - substitute or... takes a mod nation. I'm pretty certain at least one nation won't show up to the start.
Hmm... perhaps we can do something about this. Give me a little while to think things over before we consider this player list final. These are just my brainfarts made flesh, not imperial dictates.
|

September 5th, 2007, 07:52 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,712
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder Play By Email FAQ
LP -
Let me know approximately how many water/land provinces you would like, I'll work up a map and PM you with the link for your feed back.
|

September 5th, 2007, 08:54 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,355
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder Play By Email FAQ
Hmm... In my single player games (1 on 1), I generally go with 15 provinces per player to prevent anyone being stuck too close together. But my experience with large games is non-existent. Recommendations would be nice. Otherwise, I'm shooting in the dark.
15x21 = 315 maybe too large?
10x21 = 210 maybe too crowded, especially with unfamiliar mod nations?
By magically pulling an arbitrary number out of my ***, lets go for 260 provinces. So thats about 17 players 15 provinces each, or 26 players 10 provinces each for the RMG.
|

September 5th, 2007, 08:56 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,712
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder Play By Email FAQ
I like your original preference at 15 provinces per player if you're going for votes
All my games are big games and thats approximately what I use.
|

September 5th, 2007, 09:10 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder Play By Email FAQ
I'd say somewhere between 13-15 per player is a good sweet spot to hit.
I tried 10 per player in Ludus, and that was a pretty tight fit IMHO. We had a lot of rushers.
Jazzepi
|

September 7th, 2007, 12:24 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,712
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder Play By Email FAQ
I kicked off the script to generate a bunch of map files this morning. Hopefully I'll have something to show LP by tonight/tomorrow.
|

September 8th, 2007, 01:45 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 131
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder Play By Email FAQ
Guys I just got confirmed that I am going for a trip on 21st september and won't be back until the 24th september. I won't be able to do my turns during this trip. I think the best thing is to give up Tien Chi for someone else. I try to get in another game after the 24th.
|

September 8th, 2007, 02:41 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 729
Thanks: 66
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder Play By Email FAQ
Well...It looks like I will have to bow out as well; I've a big project at work that will require some concentration.
I could probably be OK for a while, but the Sons of Odin deserve someone who can give them more focus.
Good luck guys.
__________________
Power is an illusion...
|

September 9th, 2007, 10:35 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,712
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder Play By Email FAQ
Here is a better map (IMHO):
http://67.66.187.69/dominions3/bagv2.png
IF that looks good I'll start to clean it up.
|

September 10th, 2007, 01:40 AM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,355
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder Play By Email FAQ
That one's fine, but I'd like to run one by you, in a moment, for your opinion. It's probably too small though. In the end though, I'll trust your judgment with regards to maps, and let you go ahead and pick one of your choice.
If you have some suggested settings for generating a map, I'd love to hear them. What kind of settings are you using.
Map Width (1600)
Map Height (1200)
No. Prov. (350)
Sea Area (30%)
Mountain (35%)
Ruggedness (30)
River occ. (150)
Impassible mountains
Thumbnail links to half-size, lossy compressed version. In the end, I'll go with the experienced mappers choice, or yours, Velusion. But this is an example of the naval situation I like to see, albeit perhaps 5-10% too much water. Now, when I say like to see, its from my SP experiences, not multi.

|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|