|
|
|
|
 |
|

September 9th, 2007, 02:43 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
That was a number or provinces, not a turn limit.
Jazzepi
|

September 9th, 2007, 04:50 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sweden, Ume�
Posts: 991
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
Any ETA on when this game will get started ?
|

September 9th, 2007, 04:53 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,712
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
The plan was to wait for the next patch. I suppose we'll stop waiting in about next 3-4 weeks and just go ahead and start.
|

September 11th, 2007, 09:25 AM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
I updated streamers and standards to include Eriu and Tirnanog flags. I can do a larger update as per Velusion's request when the next patch comes out.
|

September 13th, 2007, 02:43 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,712
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
Quote:
Sombre said:
I updated streamers and standards to include Eriu and Tirnanog flags. I can do a larger update as per Velusion's request when the next patch comes out.
|
Sweeeet!
|

September 13th, 2007, 03:00 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,741
Thanks: 21
Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
1. I think we should wait for the patch since many major changes coming, including battlefield enchantments ending when casting mage retreats.
2. I am fine with random nation selection that we had in perp, but i do think no one should play the same nation again. I also think people that played water races, should be forced to play a land race. In other words, i do not want to see musical chairs with same players still in the water, but with different nations.
3. I am for a mod that nerfs the hell out of gem producing items or a limit of 25 total per race.
4. I am for banning the few truly game ending spells.
5. I am not in favor of ending the game with artificial limits. At the point a clear winner emerges, most players will voluntarily step aside and crown him. But I do not think they should be forced to step down if they want to fight it out.
__________________
"War is an art and as such is not susceptible of explanation by fixed formula."
- General George Patton Jr.
|

September 13th, 2007, 03:14 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,712
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
Quote:
Xietor said:
1. I think we should wait for the patch since many major changes coming, including battlefield enchantments ending when casting mage retreats.
|
There is no ETA for the patch. I'll give it a couple more weeks but I'm not keen on waiting indefinatly. When the patch comes out after we have started we will pause to patch up.
Quote:
Xietor said:
2. I am fine with random nation selection that we had in perp, but i do think no one should play the same nation again. I also think people that played water races, should be forced to play a land race. In other words, i do not want to see musical chairs with same players still in the water, but with different nations.
|
People will be free to select whatever nation they desire. Wether they win it on the other hand...
Quote:
Xietor said:
3. I am for a mod that nerfs the hell out of gem producing items or a limit of 25 total per race.
|
I am considering raising the cost of gem producing items even more than initially suggested. "Nerf the hell out" is probably not going to happen.
Quote:
Xietor said:
4. I am for banning the few truly game ending spells.
|
Arcane Nexus will remain banned. No other game spells will be modified.
|

September 13th, 2007, 03:25 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Posts: 1,109
Thanks: 14
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
Quote:
Velusion said:
Quote:
Xietor said:
4. I am for banning the few truly game ending spells.
|
Arcane Nexus will remain banned. No other game spells will be modified.
|
Wishing for Armageddon might be the only thing that is really ugly as you can drop a few of them as a parting gift and the effect is devestating.
|

September 13th, 2007, 03:27 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,741
Thanks: 21
Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
Why should a person with Lanka, LA Ermor, or LA Ryleh be free to play the same powerful races again, and the person with MA ulm perhaps be stuck with that race again?
Makes no sense to me in terms of fairness. I can honestly say I would go on ai before I would play ma ctis again.
__________________
"War is an art and as such is not susceptible of explanation by fixed formula."
- General George Patton Jr.
|

September 13th, 2007, 03:38 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sweden, Ume�
Posts: 991
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
Perhaps the bid system I suggested earlier. That way you are going to pay heavily in terms of starting position if you want the best nations.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|