|
|
|
 |
|

November 7th, 2007, 08:13 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
Quote:
Humakty said:
Are they the ONLY nation that haven't won in MP ?
|
Not even close.
|

November 7th, 2007, 09:02 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: country of stinky fromages
Posts: 564
Thanks: 29
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
So here we have our Don Quichotte, hopelessly charging windmills...
__________________
10 times more numerous, by nigth and backstabbing.
Senior member of the GLIN !
|

November 7th, 2007, 09:28 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
Lord_Bob, I will play you one-on-one, Bandar Log against Ulm if you want. Would be fun. Are you up for it?
|

November 7th, 2007, 10:47 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
I just checked MA Ulm's PD. Looks like Mr. Nerf Boy has been at it again. I get 1/2 Infrantry of Ulm per point and 1/2 Crossbowman per point. 10 WHOLE GOLD per point. Yes, that's 10 GOLD of unit. 10 WHOLE GOLD. OH. MY. GOD. SO POWERFULL. A useless arbalest and an Infrantry of Ulm who will pass out rapidly. It is not QUITE as pathetic as monkey PD, but it is quite pathetic. Oh, I also only get one TEN GOLD unit past 20.
And no, the fact that Ulm, which has the weakest results of the entire game also has fairly nerfed PD doesn't prove me wrong. I would like to say that MA Ulm PD is BARELY adequate. BARELY. MARGINALLY. But combined with the other failing of MA Ulm, it is not surprising at all that they never win. How is MA Ulm going to deal with raiding?
|

November 7th, 2007, 10:56 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
Alright. How about Man vs Bandar Log. Would you play that?
|

November 7th, 2007, 12:33 PM
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,923
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
I should be able to play against you in the next few hours if you're up for it.
Pick your nation and I'll play with whatever monkey nation you want.
I'm guessing standard settings? What map?
Also note that I have almost no monkey experience.
|

November 7th, 2007, 12:44 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
This guy is hilarious. Say something about Abysia's old age problems!
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Sombre For This Useful Post:
|
|

November 7th, 2007, 01:38 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
MA Bandar Log VS. MA Man. I need a little work on my pretender and you'll probably want to work on your white monkey bless.
I'll be able to play you tommorrow. Send me information on how to connect. I would prefer a 35 province rectangular map, but don't want to spend the time to make one.
|

November 7th, 2007, 03:30 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
Whoa whoa whoa!
Step back for a second here. You won't play MA Ulm vs the monkeys? If you refuse to play ANY NATION against any other monkey nation than you have completely negated your entire argument, Lord Bob.
Look at the thread title you used and then switch back to MA Ulm and actually prove your point instead of ranting...
Quote:
Lord_Bob said:
I just checked MA Ulm's PD. Looks like Mr. Nerf Boy has been at it again. I get 1/2 Infrantry of Ulm per point and 1/2 Crossbowman per point. 10 WHOLE GOLD per point. Yes, that's 10 GOLD of unit. 10 WHOLE GOLD. OH. MY. GOD. SO POWERFULL. A useless arbalest and an Infrantry of Ulm who will pass out rapidly. It is not QUITE as pathetic as monkey PD, but it is quite pathetic. Oh, I also only get one TEN GOLD unit past 20.
And no, the fact that Ulm, which has the weakest results of the entire game also has fairly nerfed PD doesn't prove me wrong. I would like to say that MA Ulm PD is BARELY adequate. BARELY. MARGINALLY. But combined with the other failing of MA Ulm, it is not surprising at all that they never win. How is MA Ulm going to deal with raiding?
|
|

November 7th, 2007, 03:36 PM
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,923
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
I certainly wouldn't object to Lord Bob changing to Ulm.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|