|
|
|
|
 |

December 14th, 2007, 11:22 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Ideal 4x Travel
while we're on the topic, does anyone know if the size limits for some wormholes actually counts? I've seen a few that say nothing more than, say 500kt, can pass through only to see larger ships have no problem.
|

December 15th, 2007, 05:13 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 995
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Ideal 4x Travel
Quote:
Randallw said:
while we're on the topic, does anyone know if the size limits for some wormholes actually counts? I've seen a few that say nothing more than, say 500kt, can pass through only to see larger ships have no problem.
|
No, the size limits don't matter. They were going to, so the descriptions were added, but the feature itself didn't make it.
__________________
Suction feet are not to be trifled with!
|

December 15th, 2007, 08:12 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 131
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ideal 4x Travel
The downside of "open travel" (GalCiv, Imperium Galactica, etc) is not just the difficulty of defense but how it encourages the use of "stacks'o'doom" (where an attacker piles every ship they have into a single massive fleet, capable of destroying anything else). GalCiv imposes (artificially low) fleet limits to counter this strategy but that has other downsides.
"Limited travel" systems (with warp points, warp lanes or MOO2's "committed movement" system where a fleet cannot be recalled until it has reached its destination) make the "doom stack" approach less effective since it is less able to arbitrarily switch targets, making it easier to counter.
A hybrid setup (where warp points could be used for fast but limited travel, normal space for slower, open travel) would be the most plausible system but I have only seen this implemented in the play-by-mail game Spiral Arm - here systems are connected by hyperspace portals but you can also move one fleet via "deep space movement" to any other system, albeit more slowly. This gives defensible chokepoints but also the possibility of surprise attacks on inner systems.
Warp point creation in SEV offers the option of surprise also but it is too easily countered (System Gravitational Shielding).
|

December 15th, 2007, 01:51 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Outter Glazbox
Posts: 760
Thanks: 12
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Ideal 4x Travel
If you use an open map, then you are playing a real strategy game. The universe is not 2D and the realism of a map that can emulate that is where the real challenges come in. A warp point system is very defined as you know where your enemy will come from and can have a 'welcoming' fleet. OR you can just mine the WP's and stack fleets on them. Even when you can open your own WP's later game tech prevents the use of them.
I think the best games are open maps and fleet restrictions. Lets face facts that one command ship could not possibly handle hundreds/thousand of smaller ships. Command has to be broken down into smaller control groups. A large attack fleet consisting of smaller groups make sense.
|

December 15th, 2007, 02:56 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ideal 4x Travel
What is the Stars! travel system like? I played that and VGA planets, but cannot remember.
It seems to me that the length of battles plays a major issue. If attacking a planet actually took a while, ridding the space around it of enemy ships first would be important. Most games now have battles usually ending pretty quick. In SE, after the WP, most battles will take place on the planets, as intercepting fleets is difficult due to quick movement speed.
|

December 15th, 2007, 04:46 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Outter Glazbox
Posts: 760
Thanks: 12
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Ideal 4x Travel
VGA was open map (if I remember right). Stars I'm not familiar with.
Remember that a simultaneous movement game in SE is different then a turn based game in SE. There are merits to both systems. Simultaneous movement is the better way to play multiplayer games. Turn based is good for playing against a computer opponent as the AI's just don't do well in simultaneous mode.
While most battles will be over key areas, the WAR will cover vast regions.
Remeber that Space is BIG!!! Ships are small... 
|

December 15th, 2007, 05:01 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ideal 4x Travel
What is the technical difference between simultaneous and turn based mode? I have not played against the AI in a while 
|

December 17th, 2007, 11:24 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brasil
Posts: 604
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: Ideal 4x Travel
Quote:
aegisx said:
What is the Stars! travel system like? I played that and VGA planets, but cannot remember.
|
Stars! was open space travel, no warp points needed, travel speed according to engine tech and travel distance according to the fuel of the ship (the majority of the engines had also a low-speed no-fuel needed capacity)
It also had stargates that could be constructed in your star systems and allowed instant travel among 2 gates (with several types of gates with different distance/tonnage capacities)
__________________
Currently Playing:
Megamek (latest dev version with home-made random campaign generator), Dominions 3 (with CBM) and Sins of a Solar Empire (heavily modded)
|

December 17th, 2007, 09:23 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ideal 4x Travel
I do like the Stars system.... looks like it has a lot of potential for strategic depth.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|