|
|
|
|
 |
|
March 7th, 2008, 11:31 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,066
Thanks: 109
Thanked 162 Times in 118 Posts
|
|
Re: 24 hour delay
Oh, Machaka are doing something alright. It appears to involve Tartarians and the Chalice - probably Gift of Reason too.
|
March 8th, 2008, 05:53 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: 24 hour delay
Marignon attacking Machaka? Taht would be the most stupid action MP games have seen for ages.
gregstorm:
If you can offer good price I can sell everything  |
March 8th, 2008, 10:14 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wizard\'s Tower
Posts: 603
Thanks: 26
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Re: 24 hour delay
I dont have the chalice. but I want to buy it.
Ithought it was 2 VP. mm still he needs only one now.
|
March 8th, 2008, 12:37 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,066
Thanks: 109
Thanked 162 Times in 118 Posts
|
|
Re: 24 hour delay
No, I have only one VP from the graphs. I need two more, and there are still about 7 months before I can get another.
I don't think attacking Machaka is any worse than attacking me, actually. There's a bit of a gap between the top 3 nations and the others, and the best way to bring down any one of Machaka, Mictlan and Pythium is a dogpile. Since Machaka alresdy has C'tis and Arco on their backs, joining in is not tactically unsound.
Leaving Machaka to conquer C'tis/Arco and attacking Pythium without any backup might be considered an inferior strategic choice.
|
March 8th, 2008, 07:23 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 159
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: 24 hour delay
Despite what some people seem to think, I am very interested in winning this game. I do what I think will acomplish that best. Its not my fault if some people are confused by my strategy - although Gregstrom clearly understands more than most.
|
March 9th, 2008, 08:02 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: 24 hour delay
Oh man, that Enchanted Forest sucks. I expected better units in bigger quantities. And now I will have to run with mages and gather that single units from every province. I cannot believe I have wasted so many gems on that.
|
March 9th, 2008, 10:04 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 159
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: 24 hour delay
Um... sorry guys but I'll be gone again for a few days. Lets see, from 02:00 GMT Wed. to 17:00 GMT Saturday. I think thats only one turn and I shouldn't be gone again until August or later. Would a delay be okay?
|
March 16th, 2008, 10:37 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 749
Thanks: 25
Thanked 28 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Re: 24 hour delay
I'm embarassed about the typos in my joke post!
|
March 17th, 2008, 03:16 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: 24 hour delay
I've made a post that we may need a perm sub for R'lyeh. I think we should postponed hosting of that turn by 24-48 hours to resolve all issues. If 3 players just disappear that games does not make sense.
|
March 17th, 2008, 06:11 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 116
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: 24 hour delay
I postponed the game last minute (literally). I give Zeldor time to look for another R'lyeh substitute (is the nation cursed or something?).
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
