Fallacy - Middle Era (Started!)

Xox · #1 April 24th, 2008, 10:31 PM

Well said Tichy,

And that poll Hadrian has in another thread intentionally muddies the issue.

Hadrian, Just put up a poll that says "does casting anonymous rituals break a nap?"

yes or no?

Casting an attack ritual is aggression whether it is anonymous or not,

The only aspect that the anonymous part brings up is who is the one attacking.

In our case, in the game fallacy, there was no question it was you.

Not saying your a bad person or anything, as i said before don't take this personal. I just said you broke the nap, Breaking a nap is not cheating, perfec;ly legal, might affect you getting other people to trust you in traaties though. I guess that is really what this discussion is about.

But what do you expect Hadrian?!!

You signed a treaty that said you would give me 3 turns warning before you attack and then you hit me with about 50 rain of toads!! 20 before you even started the three turn count down.

Come on, would you yourself trust a nap with another player who does that?

Reay · #2 April 24th, 2008, 11:15 PM

Yes, since the leader of the forest beings has stated that they were his toads means it is a break of the NAP.

For me a NAP is worthless if both players do not have honour.

The honourable Bakemono will try to punish the sneaky forest beings for this insolence. However this has not been an easy task.

The giants will be free to grow large again now that the toads are dead.

Hadrian_II · #3 April 25th, 2008, 01:07 PM

Quote:

Xox said:
Hadrian, Just put up a poll that says "does casting anonymous rituals break a nap?"

yes or no?

The results of the poss state that

50% of the people think that it breaks the NAP.
15% think the nap is still in place
35% are up for interpretation

I say that it does not break the letter of a nap, as it does not include a direct attack. But if someone would cast anonymous rituals on me, i would break the nap i have with him and attack him.

Quote:

Reay said:
The giants will be free to grow large again now that the toads are dead.

I will have to see that first.

edit: second poste is from reay and not from xox (copy & paste

)

Xox · #4 April 25th, 2008, 03:47 PM

You are misusing my quote Hadrian. Very deceitful. That is not the results from the poll i suggested and you have interpeted your own 7 choice poll arbitrairly and questionably down to three.

Also Your second quote you attribute to me is actually from Reay, not from me. That would be quite a bold statement if it came from me, I must admit.

Hadrian_II · #5 April 25th, 2008, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Xox said:
You are misusing my quote Hadrian. Very deceitful. That is not the results from the poll i suggested and you have interpeted your own 7 choice poll arbitrairly and questionably down to three.

I dont think there is another possibility to interpret that poll as i did.

vfb · #6 April 27th, 2008, 06:47 PM

C'tis may need to go AI in a few days. I've posted for a sub here but did not get any offers.

Xietor · #7 April 27th, 2008, 07:00 PM

The AI still might win with all of those tartarians!

Though in the next patch, which comes out in one week, they will have incurable insanity, and I have it from a good source they will do all kinds of mischief! Making them a double edged sword. Should be interesting.

Lingchih · #8 April 27th, 2008, 07:14 PM

I was in an MP game where one of the biggest players went AI at the height of his power. The AI did not win, but it meant a loss for all of it's neighbors. They could not join the fight against Ermor in that game, because the AI nation kept hitting them in the back, and had to be dealt with.

This game would of course be different. I am Ermor in this game, and am small and mostly harmless.