|
|
|
|
 |
|
June 11th, 2008, 12:18 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Stasis- MA game (open). Sign up!
Yeah, it's doable, I just thought I'd better stop cos I'm at work!
|
June 11th, 2008, 12:18 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Staring through your window
Posts: 333
Thanks: 26
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Stasis- MA game (open). Sign up!
are we gonna use the worthy heroes mod Ano?
__________________
I can has Backrub?
|
June 16th, 2008, 09:55 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 731
Thanks: 17
Thanked 36 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Re: Stasis- MA game (open). Sign up!
what is the victory condition by the way?
|
June 17th, 2008, 04:28 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 34
Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Re: Stasis- MA game (open). Sign up!
Quote:
Dragar said:
what is the victory condition by the way?
|
Standard. |
June 17th, 2008, 05:39 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: Stasis- MA game (open). Sign up!
Kill 'em all, let me sort 'em out.
>.>
|
June 17th, 2008, 10:11 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 111
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Stasis- MA game (open). Sign up!
Is there something wrong? It looks like all the players have sent in their pretenders and yet I have not received a turn.
|
June 18th, 2008, 04:58 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 34
Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Re: Stasis- MA game (open). Sign up!
I wrote llamabeast twice. Noone except him can start the game.
|
June 18th, 2008, 05:19 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Stasis- MA game (open). Sign up!
On the case, should be starting later today.
|
July 7th, 2008, 03:40 AM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 30
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Ulm - Ashdod.
It seems that there is some misunderstanding between Ulm and Ashdod. Has been informed that Ashdod is sending away messages accusing Ulm of "violating a NAP, prior to its expiration".
But below is previous message from Asdod to Ulm which states conditions of breaking a NAP:
_______________________________
I regret to inform you ...
From: chrispedersen
That as of this turn(13) my ally requires me to nullify my nap with you.
I personally think it will all be over by the time the nap expires (hostilities could commence on 17), but I am honor bound to say something.
I propose to revisit the matter with you, then.
Best wishes.
____________________
So, on turn 18 Ulm attacked some Ashdod province by a single scout and this is not NAP violation in anyway.
|
July 7th, 2008, 04:43 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: Ulm - Ashdod.
The time for pomp and ceremony is over. The hillsides of the once expansive Bandar empire glow from the fires of Ulmish armies, and the unreasonable invasion horde from Mictlan.
Neighbors, friends, and enemies of Mictlan, know this - their empire has launched an all-out offensive against us, the army is not only massive, but is supported by what would seem to be the vast bulk of Mictlan's mage-priests.
After having our primary defenses rudely crushed by Ulm, Mictlan has nearly effortlessly established a beachhead, facing only reinforcements. The only way all of you can avoid being the next target for annexation, is to strike at the soft underbelly. Take a bite from the beast, or declare him your master - time is short.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
