.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

The Falklands War: 1982- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Illwinter Game Design > Dominions 3: The Awakening

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 29th, 2010, 08:16 PM

jfp3 jfp3 is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Displaced NYC'r in OH
Posts: 131
Thanks: 18
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
jfp3 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Q: Is Friendly Fire an issue?

Yeah Mac's can be nice if overpriced toys.

But if we're talking "Game Realistic" it would seem to me that an order for Archers to "fire till the melee starts" would be fairly more realistic.

My guess now is that it's probably more of a balance issue and design choices that had to satisfy both SP & MP with the same combat engine.

Because seriously, it can't be to hard to just turn FF on/off codewise. Just my 2 cents.

Oh and I should probably mention here that I already love the game and think it is mostly superb.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old June 29th, 2010, 09:11 PM
Gandalf Parker's Avatar

Gandalf Parker Gandalf Parker is offline
Shrapnel Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
Gandalf Parker is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Q: Is Friendly Fire an issue?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfp3 View Post
Yeah Mac's can be nice if overpriced toys.
Actually my personal preference is Mac for portables, Windows for desktop, Linux for my servers, and Unix for work.

Quote:
But if we're talking "Game Realistic" it would seem to me that an order for Archers to "fire till the melee starts" would be fairly more realistic.
But if you lower yourself to the "eye level" of the archers you often dont see melee start. Which would be another reason to test the results with archers on the flanks.

Keep in mind that you get much better control using commanders. Lots of cheap indie commanders with Bows of War might get you the result you want.

Quote:
Because seriously, it can't be to hard to just turn FF on/off codewise. Just my 2 cents.
Im sure it isnt hard. In fact, it might just boil down to the fact that the people requesting it tended more toward logical argument than saying please.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 30th, 2010, 12:35 PM

Loren Loren is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 739
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Loren is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Q: Is Friendly Fire an issue?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfp3 View Post
Yeah Mac's can be nice if overpriced toys.

But if we're talking "Game Realistic" it would seem to me that an order for Archers to "fire till the melee starts" would be fairly more realistic.
Yeah, that or "Fire but not into melee" order--if melee starts they'll look elsewhere for targets.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old July 1st, 2010, 03:13 AM

DeathDaemon DeathDaemon is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
DeathDaemon is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Q: Is Friendly Fire an issue?

Archers will take a step up and try to get a bit closer before firing when near friendlies.

Generally, your arrow-repellent squad (the one taking fire from the enemy) should request friendly archer support. Crossbows are a different story... learn to avoid FF with archers first
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.