Bradley vs Abrams

[Imp]

Certainly going for the infantry ones has its merits over the Abrams depends what you want.

Vs Armour good at range though less shots than a tank & firing restrictions.

Everything else it probably does better.
Carrys 6 men & the cannon makes light work of enemy troops helos etc

[iCaMpWiThAWP]

I would take the Abrams if heavy tank action is expected, but if that's not the case, the bradley is more versatile, it will destroy all kinds of armor that show up, destroy infantry, and pack some men to mop up.

[void1984]

OK, I have found the APC version under Infantry/Inf Mech Plt. It comes with pricy Javelin teams, but I can remove halt of that platoon after a purchase to spend only 1221 points. Generally in the places where I can buy an APC only Stryker variants are avalible.

Is "TA-ATGM weapon class" important? Does it behave different than any other weapon with the same ACC, HEAT penetration and warhead?

I was looking for an inexpensive universal armoured support for USA company in 2010. I can see that M1128 MGS+ is used for that task.

I have playe WW2 era much more than MBT and I can see that I should stop considering armour in that era cathegories - tank, armoured car, simple APC. That made me confused why an APC (I have to admit - a sophisticated one) cost the same as heavy tank.

[DRG]

Originally Posted by void1984

OK, I have found the APC version under Infantry/Inf Mech Plt. It comes with pricy Javelin teams,

Mech Pl [-AT] ( formation 783 )

and

Mech Co [-AT] ( formations 785, 786, 787 )


do not have the Javelin teams .


Don