|
|
|
|
| Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |
|

January 27th, 2017, 04:05 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 146
Thanked 391 Times in 201 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Invasion of the Baltic States
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeraaa
Modern Russia has to fight much more smart and carefully if she wants to have any reasonable chance of success.
|
Old habits die hard.
Historically the Soviet/Russian art of warfare has been more amazing in theory than in practice. Maybe they have reached their 2020 goals etc ahead of time but I doubt it.
|

January 27th, 2017, 05:29 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 595
Thanks: 162
Thanked 346 Times in 209 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Invasion of the Baltic States
Quote:
Originally Posted by wulfir
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeraaa
Modern Russia has to fight much more smart and carefully if she wants to have any reasonable chance of success.
|
Old habits die hard.
Historically the Soviet/Russian art of warfare has been more amazing in theory than in practice. Maybe they have reached their 2020 goals etc ahead of time but I doubt it.
|
It was amazing in practise as well...when it was actually performed and not when Soviets were doing knee-jerk reactions to stop the Germans onslaught in the early years. Examples can be found in Operation Bagration, the Vistula-Oder offensive and Manchuria. In the Cold War they simply perfected an already proven system, while NATO was struggling to find a plan that didn't involve "push the red button after the Soviet tanks penetrate our lines". NATO finally found a doctrine that offered better chances of winning tactical victories, hoping that this would translate into operational success (something that they did not have as a concept until the late 80's IIRC) and relying on technological assets. Problem was that the Soviets were already thinking operationally and wars are won on the highest levels, not on the number of battles one side wins (and historical examples are abundant).
Having said that, modern Russia is not USSR. Because of the massive disadvantage in every field compared to the latter, they have to change the way they fight and actually it seems they are doing it. Yes, it won't be a smooth transition, but no country has that good fortune. And they did have a chance to see it in action in Ukraine. Will it be enough to enable them to fight the top tier NATO nations? I hope we won't have to see. But don't underestimate the bear.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Aeraaa For This Useful Post:
|
|

January 27th, 2017, 06:24 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 146
Thanked 391 Times in 201 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Invasion of the Baltic States
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeraaa
It was amazing in practise as well...when it was actually performed and not when Soviets were doing knee-jerk reactions to stop the Germans onslaught in the early years.
|
The massive initial Soviet losses in WWII were in part due to their inability to wage mobile war vs the Germans and lack of training (some training was done on the battlefield itself resulting in errors and losses). While they are later able to hold the overall initiative their offensives followed a set piece pattern and was for the most part uninspired at the tactical level.
Finland summer 1944 - the initial Soviet attack is delivered with such force and numbers that they need not care much about possible Finnish countermeassures and although being able to advance some they are unable to fully break the Finnish resistance - their offensive fails. The last Soviet effort against Finland (Illomantsi) ends in a clear Soviet defeat...
|

January 28th, 2017, 02:16 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 429
Thanks: 705
Thanked 99 Times in 79 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Invasion of the Baltic States
Bear in mind a lot of good Russian offices died in the revolution or left the Soviet Service. Then in the 1930's the vile Stalin had a great many leading soldiers executed. None of which did the Soviet performance much good in the earlier part of World War Two, against a German Army with both high training, experience and morale...
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to IronDuke99 For This Useful Post:
|
|

January 29th, 2017, 02:24 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: I ain't in Kansas anymore, just north of where Dorothy clicked her heels is where you'll find me.
Posts: 878
Thanks: 584
Thanked 277 Times in 191 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Invasion of the Baltic States
I wonder what form a Russian invasion would take. A full scale attack or a limited engagement akin to what we've witnessed in the Ukraine. There a good number of Russian speakers in the Baltic states, and organizations that could antagonize those governments then as a pretense Russia might invade on a limited scale to protect those Russian's rights.
Either way, what would be the response of Sweden and Finland, two countries not a part of NATO?
=====
|

January 29th, 2017, 06:02 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 429
Thanks: 705
Thanked 99 Times in 79 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Invasion of the Baltic States
Quote:
Originally Posted by shahadi
I wonder what form a Russian invasion would take. A full scale attack or a limited engagement akin to what we've witnessed in the Ukraine. There a good number of Russian speakers in the Baltic states, and organizations that could antagonize those governments then as a pretense Russia might invade on a limited scale to protect those Russian's rights.
Either way, what would be the response of Sweden and Finland, two countries not a part of NATO?
=====
|
I would be amazed, to put it mildly, if Sweden or Finland did a thing beyond some totally pointless verbal protest at the UN.
|

January 31st, 2017, 08:47 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 146
Thanked 391 Times in 201 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Invasion of the Baltic States
Quote:
Originally Posted by shahadi
Either way, what would be the response of Sweden and Finland, two countries not a part of NATO?
|
Sweden has declared it will not remain neutral with the so called “declaration of solidarity” and participates in a number of NATO drills and NATO operations (Cold Response, Afghanistan, Libya). The Swedish ground forces are however in a pitiful state when compared to the large but less advanced cold war army. Sweden could I imagine contribute no more than a battle group of battalion(+) size as a sort of symbolic force at present. But could also open its borders and air fields to NATO air.
But, in Sweden there is an anti-immigration party which seems to steadily be gaining ground. This party views Putin/Russia in a favourable light. Should this party be in power at the time of a Russian invasion of the Baltics I assume there would be no Swedish reaction (assuming the invasion takes place a few years from now)...
Finland has retained the conscription army and can mobilise considerable conventional forces should Finland come under threat. Even if Finland does not deploy forces to the Baltic states I imagine Russia would not leave the northern flank completely open…
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wulfir For This Useful Post:
|
|

January 31st, 2017, 09:34 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 429
Thanks: 705
Thanked 99 Times in 79 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Invasion of the Baltic States
Quote:
Originally Posted by wulfir
Quote:
Originally Posted by shahadi
Either way, what would be the response of Sweden and Finland, two countries not a part of NATO?
|
Sweden has declared it will not remain neutral with the so called “declaration of solidarity” and participates in a number of NATO drills and NATO operations (Cold Response, Afghanistan, Libya). The Swedish ground forces are however in a pitiful state when compared to the large but less advanced cold war army. Sweden could I imagine contribute no more than a battle group of battalion(+) size as a sort of symbolic force at present. But could also open its borders and air fields to NATO air.
But, in Sweden there is an anti-immigration party which seems to steadily be gaining ground. This party views Putin/Russia in a favourable light. Should this party be in power at the time of a Russian invasion of the Baltics I assume there would be no Swedish reaction (assuming the invasion takes place a few years from now)...
Finland has retained the conscription army and can mobilise considerable conventional forces should Finland come under threat. Even if Finland does not deploy forces to the Baltic states I imagine Russia would not leave the northern flank completely open…
|
At the risk of getting too political why would an anti immigration party in Sweden (and I presume it is anti Islamic immigration) be pro Putin and Russia? Or, to put it another way, why would a pro Islamist immigration party be anti Putin and Russia? Surely Putin's Russia is not the biggest threat to Sweden right now?
I am genuinely puzzled by this, given my own ideas about who the enemies of Western civilisation actually are: To my mind all forms of militant Islam, closely followed by China (actually a huge longer term threat) and, way back, North Korea.
I do think there is a window right now to make Russia much less of a potential enemy than she has been any time since the early 1900's. It may, or may not, get taken...
Last edited by IronDuke99; January 31st, 2017 at 09:44 PM..
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to IronDuke99 For This Useful Post:
|
|

January 27th, 2017, 05:38 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 146
Thanked 391 Times in 201 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Invasion of the Baltic States
Anyways, a couple of years ago I started building a German/NATO vs Russia campaign set in southern Estonia.
The idea was a that the player would command a mixed battle group of somewhat unready NATO forces during the initial stages of a Russkie invasion...
I experimented with adding an element from a different OOB into the fixed German core force - here an attached Dutch mech inf coy - I did not intend for the player to be able to refit destroyed units and that the campaign would only last 5-6 battles...
Didn't really turn out that great. Stopped working on it halfway through. Buuut, if anyone wants to kill some time, here it is..., the Russians won't be all that problematic in this setup...
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wulfir For This Useful Post:
|
|

July 1st, 2017, 07:19 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Greece, EU
Posts: 55
Thanks: 55
Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Invasion of the Baltic States
Quote:
Originally Posted by wulfir
Anyways, a couple of years ago I started building a German/NATO vs Russia campaign set in southern Estonia.
The idea was a that the player would command a mixed battle group of somewhat unready NATO forces during the initial stages of a Russkie invasion...
I experimented with adding an element from a different OOB into the fixed German core force - here an attached Dutch mech inf coy - I did not intend for the player to be able to refit destroyed units and that the campaign would only last 5-6 battles...
Didn't really turn out that great. Stopped working on it halfway through. Buuut, if anyone wants to kill some time, here it is..., the Russians won't be all that problematic in this setup...
|
The C023s000.dat, C023s002.dat & C023s003.dat files are missing. Campaign cannot be played.
Can't believe that 36 people downloaded it before me (two actually thanked you) and none noticed!!! 
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|