"Survivor 2" Round 11 is about to start

Asmala · #1 February 20th, 2003, 08:32 PM

This tournament sounds very nice. Too bad when it started I didn't know anyting about it because I didn't played SE4 at the time. I guess it will take very long before Survivor 3 start (if there is going to be such) but how long? I'd like to know how long I have to wait, few months or over year?

geoschmo · #2 February 20th, 2003, 08:42 PM

Well, Survivor 1 ran for more than a year. Survivor 2 started in August. It's hard to say how long it will Last but chances are it will be months.

There isn't a reason really we couldn't have separate tournaments running at the same time. I'd call it something else to avoid confusion. Would probably make it a different format too.

Taking suggestions for possible new tournament here.

Geoschmo

[ February 20, 2003, 19:07: Message edited by: geoschmo ]

spoon · #3 February 20th, 2003, 09:16 PM

Quote:

However, for some reason there seems to be a preference for game2.

Everyone is afraid of the Worms of Woe in Game1. Askan was so intimidated, he quit altogether...

geoschmo · #4 February 20th, 2003, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by spoon:

quote:

However, for some reason there seems to be a preference for game2.

Everyone is afraid of the Worms of Woe in Game1. Askan was so intimidated, he quit altogether...

Oh my.

I am sure that's not it. But if it makes you feel better to think so...

P.S. Askan, if you feel the need to rejoin now and teach Spoon a lesson for his insolence, let me know.

Grandpa Kim · #5 February 21st, 2003, 12:33 AM

Quote:

Everyone is afraid of the Worms of Woe in Game1.

Nope, worms are icky!

Rollo · #6 February 21st, 2003, 01:27 AM

say spoon, what are those weird circles on your forehead...

rextorres · #7 February 21st, 2003, 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by geoschmo:

quote:
Originally posted by sparhawk:
True Geoschmo, but game 2 now has 12 player: only two people have to leave????

sparhawk

That is correct. Because Askan has chosen not to continue, that reduces the number of available players and reduces the number needed to eliminate to get to 20 after this round. There are still five more eligible players that have not joined their round 4 game. It's still entirely possible one or mroe of these players will choose not to continue, further reducing the number of players. If more then 2 of the 5 do so I will have to kick one of the players from game 2 and have them join game 1. But I won't know that for a few days.

Geoschmo

I don't think forcing a player to switch is fair!! If the switched player has been cooperating with other players in his own group he all of a sudden is isolated in the new group without any friends. If group 1 has only ten players they should just start with that amount and force them to eliminate one of their players. Merging should happen all at once not piece meal.