|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 5th, 2002, 09:41 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jun 2002 
						Posts: 463
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Are single facility planets useful for anything other than \'bookmarks\' (waypoints?) 
 I've colonized a few out-system tiny (red plus) planets when they've had ancient artifacts on them.
 What facility would you build there?
 Would you abandon that planet once you have the tech or does it pay to stick around in the event a colonizable ability reveals another ruin planet in that system?
 
				__________________  'There are old space jockies and bold space jockies but there ain't no old, bold space jockies'
			 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 5th, 2002, 09:47 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 BANNED USER |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Near Boston, MA, USA 
						Posts: 2,471
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Are single facility planets useful for anything other than \'bookmarks\' (waypoints?) 
 Resupply DepotsSystem Wide Facilites
 Drop off points for units, (to be picked up by other ships)
 Unit Production
 Ship or Fleet Training Facilites, (though it is best to have both of these on the same planet)
 Bunch of other  uses
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 5th, 2002, 09:48 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Brigadier General |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 2001 
						Posts: 1,859
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Are single facility planets useful for anything other than \'bookmarks\' (waypoints?) 
 Extremely High Tech
 - Build an Atmosphear Converter, wait 3-2 years, and build the stuff you want when it becomes breathable
 
 High Tech
 
 - Build one of those System-wide Facilities you want for your system to save that valuable facil space for your other planets
 
 Medium Tech
 
 - Resupply or a Space Yard Planet for a Moon or something.
 
 Low Tech
 
 - Get all you can out of it.
 
 High in Minerals - Mineral Facil
 High in Organics - Farm
 High in Radioactives - Refining Facil
 Nothing - Research Facil
 
				__________________ 
				A* E* Se++ GdQ $ Fr! C Csc Sf+ Ai- M Mp* S++ Ss- R! Pw Fq Nd Rp+ G++ Mm+ Bb++ Tcp+ L Au 
 
Download Sev Today!  --- Download BOB  and SOCk  today too! --- Thanks to Fyron and Trooper for hosting.
   |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 5th, 2002, 09:56 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2000 
						Posts: 5,085
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Are single facility planets useful for anything other than \'bookmarks\' (waypoints?) 
 Why would anyone waste a perfectly good planet like that? Second time I've seen people considering abandoning a planet just because it only has one slot..
 Phoenix-D
 
				__________________ 
				Phoenix-D
 
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation. 
-Digger |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 5th, 2002, 10:12 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: South Carolina, USA 
						Posts: 369
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Are single facility planets useful for anything other than \'bookmarks\' (waypoints?) 
 Research and build troops. Go invade someone who breathes the atmosphere of the tiny planet. Transport conquered population to the outpost. Work their alien butts off.
 Another option: build a space yard. Build a base space yard. Scrap the planetary space yard and build something in its place. Now you can build ships at that planet (albeit more slowly) with something else in the planet's facility slot.
 
 Usually I just put a space yard on tiny unbreathables, just so the planet can build ships in time of need. (Hey, if you've got the resources to support all those space yards, might as well put then to good use!)
 
 Quikngruvn
 
				__________________The opposite of war isn't peace... it's creation.  --from [i]Rent</i]
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 5th, 2002, 10:57 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Ohio, USA 
						Posts: 4,323
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Are single facility planets useful for anything other than \'bookmarks\' (waypoints?) 
 
	Yeesh... while they might not be the same priority level as larger worlds, tiny worlds are still WORLDS. Once you build something there, even a lone mineral extraction facility, you get the output at no maintenance cost forever more. What could be wrong with that? And yes, once you have the tech you can build an atmosphere converter and get more space. Or you can enslave some aliens that breathe the atmosphere and move them there. This is both much cheaper and quicker.Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Elowan: I've colonized a few out-system tiny (red plus) planets when they've had ancient artifacts on them.
 
 What facility would you build there?
 Would you abandon that planet once you have the tech or does it pay to stick around in the event a colonizable ability reveals another ruin planet in that system?
 |    
 The only reason I can see to abandon a tiny world is if you want to use remote mining. You can get much more output from a tiny world using a large base full of remote extraction components than you can even with atmosphere conVersion or a native-breather race. With a starbase you can get something like 20 times as much! But that's going to reduce the value of the world if you haven't changed the setting that controls remote mining.
			
			
			
			
				  |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		
		 Hybrid Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |