|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 6th, 2005, 06:49 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2003 
						Posts: 110
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Question on Boarding Operations 
 I am in a life and death struggle with an organic race. I do not have the tech to defeat them. There ships have organic armor but no shields. 
 My question does this leave them vulnerable to boarding operations? Does the special armor have to be defeated before a ship can capture another ship?
 
 Thanks
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 6th, 2005, 06:58 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Ohio 
						Posts: 8,450
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Question on Boarding Operations 
 Nope, boarding is a great early defense against an organic race. Expect them to rapidly start putting security stations or self destruct devices on board to counter the threat. It might buy you some time to come up with a long term strategy though. 
				__________________I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
 Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 6th, 2005, 07:07 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Southern CA, USA 
						Posts: 18,394
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Question on Boarding Operations 
 Security Stations are quite expensive though, and cost minerals. This will reduce the number of ships the enemy can build, and make it take longer (one of the advantages of organic tech is that resource costs can be balanced between minerals and organics, thus greatly speeding up build times). Self Destruct Devices, on the other hand, are insanely cheap and small... They quite effectively eliminate boarding from being a useful tactic in more than a few isolated circumstances.   |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 6th, 2005, 07:19 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Texas 
						Posts: 962
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Question on Boarding Operations 
 Yet...that will be one less ship for the enemy to use as well...because it will have blown up...so now your boarding ships are like big ugly missiles...   
Kana |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 6th, 2005, 07:22 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2000 
						Posts: 1,246
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Question on Boarding Operations 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Kana said: Yet...that will be one less ship for the enemy to use as well...because it will have blown up...so now your boarding ships are like big ugly missiles...
 
 
  
 Kana
 
 |  big expensive missiles...
				__________________When a cat is dropped, it always lands on its feet, and when toast is dropped, it always lands with the buttered side facing down. I propose to strap buttered toast to the back of a cat. The two will hover, spinning inches above the ground. With a giant buttered cat array, a high-speed monorail could easily link New York with Chicago.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 6th, 2005, 07:22 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Connecticut 
						Posts: 1,518
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Question on Boarding Operations 
 Of course, a bunch of frigates with boarding parties will overcome a dreadnought's defence, and trigger the auto destruct sequence.  A swarm of these sacrafice frigates will inflict some serious carnage on the opposing fleet.  IIRC, the latest patch will have boarding ships suicidally board ships with self destruct devices.
 [EDIT]
 
 Dang, I'm slow today.  But my comment still stands -- research a few levels of boarding parties, put them on your smallest ship, maybe with fighters armed with small shield depleters (shields will start appearing soon), can be a fair tradeoff against big expensive ships.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 7th, 2005, 10:36 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Private |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2004 
						Posts: 27
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Question on Boarding Operations 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Instar said: 
 
	big expensive missiles...Quote: 
	
		| Kana said: Yet...that will be one less ship for the enemy to use as well...because it will have blown up...so now your boarding ships are like big ugly missiles...
 
 
  
 Kana
 
 |  
 |  Heh...depends on how you do it.  If I knew somebody had a bunch of big ships with self-destructs on them, I'd be sure to try and capture them with stupid little ships.
 
C'mon...who wouldn't sacrifice a Frigate to take out a Dreadnought?  (or something to that effect)
				__________________I'm sewage flavored.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 7th, 2005, 10:41 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Ohio 
						Posts: 8,450
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Question on Boarding Operations 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| ToxicSlurpee said: C'mon...who wouldn't sacrifice a Frigate to take out a Dreadnought?  (or something to that effect)
 
 |  Well, if I was on the frigate I might not be too keen on the idea.  
				__________________I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
 Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
 |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |