|
|
|
View Poll Results: Which best defines your SE:V feelings based on the Demo?
|
SE:V is not ready to be sold. It needs a lot more work to be ready. Selling it now would do more harm than good for customer relations and hurt the overall success. I am willing to wait for a more refined product.
|
  
|
35 |
32.71% |
SE:V should not be sold in its current state but could do ok on the market if released now. I'd still rather wait for a more refined game.
|
  
|
24 |
22.43% |
SE:V could be sold now with moderate success. Based on Malfador's history of product support, patches will be issued. But I'm worried about the chances of improving the UI with patches. I'd wait to release.
|
  
|
32 |
29.91% |
I'm pretty happy with the current state of SE:V. Based on the Demo, it should be sold soon. If patches are released or not, it's a pretty good game. I'm anxious to get the game soon, release it now.
|
  
|
12 |
11.21% |
I think the game is good as it stands. I think the issues being raised are minor and can pretty easily be addressed in game as it stands. Most games have minor issues and I'm not complaining. Send it out!
|
  
|
3 |
2.80% |
I am completely satisfied with SE:V based on the demo. I don't care if patches are ever released. I don't think the issues being raised by a small number of people represent the silent majority of potential customers. I am very anxious to get this game
|
  
|
1 |
0.93% |
 |
|

September 19th, 2006, 07:20 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Somewhere on the wine-dark sea...
Posts: 236
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE:V Poll
Quote:
Gandalf Parker said:
I also wonder if the 3D thing might not slow down the creation of new races which is one of the things I loved about SEIV was having something like 300 races in it.
|
I think this is a legitimate concern, because it certainly worked that way in the Civ franchise. In Civ2 I could and did roll my own unit graphics all the time, whereas in Civ3/4 you need 3D animation SW and I don't have time to learn it.
However, eventually the available Civ3 unit library had everything I could imagine so eventually the issue went away. Looks like CiV4 is on well underway to the same destination.
|

September 19th, 2006, 11:20 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: SE:V Poll
Gandalf Parker said:
I also wonder if the 3D thing might not slow down the creation of new races which is one of the things I loved about SEIV was having something like 300 races in it.
I don't; SE4 had a rather slow buildup of ship sets... It wasn't until just a few years ago when shipset count got so high (around/after Gold). The starting community of SE5 is larger than it was for SE4, so there are bound to be more graphics people around with SE5 early days than SE4. A fair majority of original (not screen captures of SW ships or whatever) SE4 shipset authors used normal 3d apps to make their sets, not Doga. Thing is, most of them only made a few sets, so they tend to be overwhelmed in the volume of work by, say, Atrocities, who only used Doga.
Artaud said:
It should be an option when you start the game...
It is there, in the Game Options tab.
|

September 19th, 2006, 11:43 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 86
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE:V Poll
Least favorite feature has to be the tech levels. Fairly annoying that its pretty much never ending. Nice to have a top level to reach
|

September 20th, 2006, 02:01 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Woodland,CA
Posts: 918
Thanks: 14
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: SE:V Poll
Quote:
Gandalf Parker said:
Quote:
PDF said:
Quote:
Gandalf Parker said:
Except that Ive already bought the game (but would rather not vote that way). And there is also not one for "I think SEV went the wrong direction completely".
I was wondering if it was too soon to poll the question of whether they should be an SEV forum.
|
Which "wrong direction" ? SE5 is 90% SE4 concept- and gameplay-wise, do you refer to the new move to 3D ?
Although I'm not happy with the UI I still find the new graphics much better than SE4s, which looked like a spreadsheet more than a game at (numerous) times ... 
And the SE5 forum is here isn't it ?
|
I would rather have seen an improved SEIV game (AI, UI, modding, etc) rather than an eye-candy bloated SEV game. Thats just my opinion but I feel that the scren is full of pretty pictures which slow down the game and make it harder to play at a decent speed. I also wonder if the 3D thing might not slow down the creation of new races which is one of the things I loved about SEIV was having something like 300 races in it. And giant maps (als0 modded in later by players). The SEIV out-of-the-box was a very tiney game, almost a demo itself, compared to what the player mods turned it into.
As for the forums, thats exactly my point. I would rather that the SEIV forums NOT become the SEV forum since Im beginning to doubt whether SEIV will die off now.
And I think Shrapnel would support the creation of such a forum. The fact that this forum has traffic is not really a selling point. The load and archiving of this forum is something that just makes me more appreciative that Shrapnel keeps these things running for its ex-products.
|
Just a quick couple of comments-
A) I'm thinking GP may be onto to something here, since it seems that the lean here is towards SEV, shouldn't there be a place to discuss just SEIV if you haven't thrown in the towel on it or put it aside in favor of SEV?
B) Again, an example here of leaning against anyone not completely in favor of SEV. GP's opinion is that SEV went the wrong way for his likes. HIS opinion, and as valid as anyone else's. And he's promptly corrected.
C) I disagree ( just my opinion !!!) that " Gameplay-wise" the new SEV is " 90%" the same as SEIV. Seems to me that nearly everything from ship design to actual on-screen game play is different. The concepts may be the same, but the actual gameplay is far different.
|

September 20th, 2006, 02:13 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: SE:V Poll
I think you are making a mountain out of a molehill... I do honestly think the 3d shipset thing is being blown out of proportion by some people. It isn't that big of a change for most shipset authors. It has absolutely nothing to do with "leaning on anyone not completely in favor of SE5"... In fact, if you review more of my recent postings, you will see numerous complaints.
Seriously though, if you want forums that will always be devoted to SE4, you could always use SEnet:
http://www.spaceempires.net/home/forum-c3.html
http://www.spaceempires.net/home/forum-30.html
|

September 20th, 2006, 02:30 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NS, Canada
Posts: 300
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE:V Poll
Maybe it wasn't your intention, but that sounds a lot like 'if you don't like it you can go somewhere else', which isn't exactly a friendly thing to say.
|

September 20th, 2006, 05:18 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Woodland,CA
Posts: 918
Thanks: 14
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: SE:V Poll
Quote:
Imperator Fyron said:
I think you are making a mountain out of a molehill... I do honestly think the 3d shipset thing is being blown out of proportion by some people. It isn't that big of a change for most shipset authors. It has absolutely nothing to do with "leaning on anyone not completely in favor of SE5"... In fact, if you review more of my recent postings, you will see numerous complaints. 
Seriously though, if you want forums that will always be devoted to SE4, you could always use SEnet:
http://www.spaceempires.net/home/forum-c3.html
http://www.spaceempires.net/home/forum-30.html
|
Mountain or molehill, I know what I like, and what I don't.
The " 3D shipset thing" isn't what I said at all. No, I don't like the entire 3D format it went to - ships, planets, solar systems, whatever. If I'd personally been interested in that, there are much better 3D environment games I'd have gone with. And some of those " numerous complaints" are just like the ones of mine you just shot down. I was refering to, and seconding, GP's suggestion to create a SEIV section, since obviously SEV has overwhelmingly swamped the forum as it stands now.
And as to a general lean against dissenting points of view - " Seriously though, if you want forums that will always be devoted to SE4, you could always use SEnet:" is a pretty good example. That statement seems to shout " If I don't like the dominating topic here, I can just pack up and go elsewhere". And obviously that's not my point of view alone, as StarShadow's comment proves. I don't beleive the overall tone is deliberately negative, but I do see it as being there just the same.
Honestly, I think overall SEV is a long-awaited treasure for some people, and missed the marked big-time for others. And it is certainly seems to be drawing a very subtle line in the sand...
|

September 24th, 2006, 02:29 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: SE:V Poll
???
The forums that were SEIV when SEIV sold here, and has all the SEIV information archived, should be the ones that move to a new location? I have no problem with an SEV forum being created here but I dont think the SEIV conversations moving is a good idea.
And isnt that your domain? The SEIV conversations should switch to a forum where you are moderator? Altho Im sure you see no problem with that, dont be surprised if others do.
Gandalf Parker
__________________
-- DISCLAIMER:
This game is NOT suitable for students, interns, apprentices, or anyone else who is expected to pass tests on a regular basis. Do not think about strategies while operating heavy machinery. Before beginning this game make arrangements for someone to check on you daily. If you find that your game has continued for more than 36 hours straight then you should consult a physician immediately (Do NOT show him the game!)
|

September 19th, 2006, 02:56 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 776
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE:V Poll
Quote:
PDF said:
Although I'm not happy with the UI I still find the new graphics much better than SE4s, which looked like a spreadsheet more than a game at (numerous) times ... 
|
OK I REALLY REALLY HATE this "spreadsheets in space is bad" thing. it's the reason aaron went to bloated UI and graphics crap in the first place! a spreadsheet is used PRECICELY because you can get a lot of information in a small easy to see space.
spreadsheets are GOOD!!!111oneoneone
now where the hell did my happy place go...
__________________
[img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Flag_NewZeland.gif[/img]
|

September 19th, 2006, 03:19 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE:V Poll
Quote:
se5a said:
OK I REALLY REALLY HATE this "spreadsheets in space is bad" thing. it's the reason aaron went to bloated UI and graphics crap in the first place!
|
I like a nice spreadsheet view for managing my empire, but I like the direction SEV is going, graphic wise. I like the "bloated" look. It gives a nice feel to the game. It could be tweaked, but its much nicer on the eyes, imho.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|