MP VS League - Page 7

Executor · #1 July 8th, 2009, 11:31 AM

The settings should really be left to the two players playing. I'm for random nations myself, however if people want to play Arco vs Marverni it's their choice.

As there is interest for 1vs1 games, I say a sticky be made for organizing such games, with some voluntary players admining (nation selection, and such).

Now what I think would be interesting, is a turnament.
For eg. 16 players sign up, and we play by knock out until there there are two players left for the finals.

llamabeast · #2 July 8th, 2009, 01:20 PM

1 game at a time is not much, being as they might easily last a month or two each.

Lavaere · #3 July 8th, 2009, 07:42 PM

what does balance matter, if you choose someone you like playing. your gonna learn how to fight the other nations eventually

DakaSha · #4 July 8th, 2009, 10:38 PM

i dont think balance is that much of an issue in the first place as i have stated before

@quantum
i didnt quote you correctly i was referring to the overusage of only 'powerful' nations

Executor · #5 July 11th, 2009, 05:05 AM

Anyone interested in a 1vs1 with me?

DakaSha · #6 July 11th, 2009, 05:15 AM

im in too many games right now

btw im planning on getting a cheap website up for the ladder but it may take awhile

DakaSha · #7 July 12th, 2009, 08:58 AM

looks like a friend is probably gonna make the core website that i can modify

GrudgeBringer · #8 July 12th, 2009, 10:43 PM

SURE.....if YOU play EA Marverni and I play EA Arco.

DakaSha · #9 July 12th, 2009, 10:58 PM

ill be the first to take you up on that challenge ^^

edit: also it wont be that easy to get to the top of the ladder by always playing so called "powerhouses". so you play EA arco all you want ^^

WingedDog · #10 July 12th, 2009, 11:33 PM

EA Arco is a powerhouse?