Beer game! EA - Signup Closed! - Page 20

Executor · #1 March 21st, 2009, 01:37 PM

Well... I think under these circumstances the NAP is OK to be broken, or disregarded. I've been in some similar situations and people agree.
And I picked the fort with the least defence in it.

karnoza · #2 March 21st, 2009, 01:59 PM

No problem with this broken NAP. I justed wanted you to understand that if I didn't publicly say about controlling 6 capitals you wouldn't even think of attacking now and the game would be over this turn.

But again, no problem.

Executor · #3 March 21st, 2009, 02:16 PM

Yeah, you right about that. But for some reason I was deluded that you had to inform when you capture the 6 capitals, which Slobby corrected me.

Executor · #4 March 21st, 2009, 03:29 PM

Which capitals do you have anyway?
I know about Arco, Cealum, Abysia and your own.

But I never found out where C'tis, T'N'N, Fomoria and Lanka started.

ano · #5 March 21st, 2009, 03:32 PM

Lanka is 232, Fomoria is 188. Both controlled by Vanheim

Executor · #6 March 21st, 2009, 03:41 PM

Man, Fomoria had a terrible starting position.
Hmm strange, I thought Cealum took Lankas capital, never realized those two provinces down there were connected.

I really hated this map by the way, I started two games on it at the same time and handed over one of them even doe I had a great position just because of the damn map, and I was gonna hand over this game also, but than Agartha (and some other nations) attacked me so I decided to stick around for a while, never expected to run up to the finish considering my position in this game at that time.

ano · #7 March 21st, 2009, 05:36 PM

Yep, Fomorian position was very bad. Not terrific because they have sailing though.
That's why I'll probably never again play without predefined starting locations. This game brings a lot of randomness in many aspects and I don't like to add any more... I don't like games where starting position decides world's fates

.
However, this map is quite good and I really like it. It needs a few balancing modifications, of course, but it is good.

Slobby · #8 March 21st, 2009, 10:28 PM

sooo just to be clear do you guys want me to roll it back?

Executor · #9 March 22nd, 2009, 08:29 AM

Let's rollback and rehost it first and if it doesn't work, we'll rollback again and redo our turns.

karnoza · #10 March 22nd, 2009, 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Executor

Let's rollback and rehost it first and if it doesn't work, we'll rollback again and redo our turns.

+1