Forge of Godhood - started - Page 20

namad · #1 August 23rd, 2009, 03:20 AM

qm, if you are the last one to submit, and you are waiting to submit until near the deadline... it might be more efficient to simply submit whenever you notice and then add a delay equal to however many hours you submitted...

Ironhawk · #2 August 22nd, 2009, 01:18 PM

I'm going to declare war on any nation whose turn is not in within the next.... 5 hours. Thx

Executor · #3 August 24th, 2009, 01:12 PM

I'd understand if noobs always teamed up against someone, but in dominions, it's always the opposite for some reason, vets tend to do it for more, it's a little disappointing...

Hm, who would have expected that Lich to be so resilient.

Well, come and get me ya bastards!

Jarkko · #4 August 24th, 2009, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Executor

I'd understand if noobs always teamed up against someone, but in dominions, it's always the opposite for some reason, vets tend to do it for more, it's a little disappointing...

So playing smart is disappointing?

Frozen Lama · #5 August 24th, 2009, 01:26 PM

I see smaug has returned. would he care to test his mettle against Frozen Lama?

vfb · #6 August 24th, 2009, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frozen Lama

I see smaug has returned. would he care to test his mettle against Frozen Lama?

Just you wait a couple months! We'll have so much gear on him he'll be invincible! Moo ha ha ha ha ha. We expect the false Machakan Wrym to be kitted out nicely, oh, somewhere around the year 17, based on your current research levels.

-- The Council of Cardinals

Executor · #7 August 24th, 2009, 01:50 PM

To me it's playing cowardly, safety in numbers, almost anyone will fall under multiple attacks.
I don't see the joy in playing the game that way. I know only a handful of people that prefer to go solo into war and that's what really disappointing.

Jarkko · #8 August 24th, 2009, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Executor

To me it's playing cowardly, safety in numbers, almost anyone will fall under multiple attacks.
I don't see the joy in playing the game that way.

So others should sit and wait on the side-lines patiently for their turn while one strong nation eats up them one at a time? That is quite an interesting way to expect people to act

Micah · #9 August 24th, 2009, 02:14 PM

Hey, when I'm in the lead I'm all for solo wars!

Funny how you never hear the little guy who is charging bravely into battle against a superior foe complaining about how extra people entering the war ruined his joy and turned him into a coward, it's always the big guy that's complaining when the odds turn...

Executor · #10 August 24th, 2009, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micah

Hey, when I'm in the lead I'm all for solo wars!

Funny how you never hear the little guy who is charging bravely into battle against a superior foe complaining about how extra people entering the war ruined his joy and turned him into a coward, it's always the big guy that's complaining when the odds turn...

Micah, I'm not complaining, I'm just stating. I'm rather used to this from my experience.
That's why I much more prefer no score graphs, and even no wraparound maps. That just given them more ability to gangbang you.

Everyone usually attack if they have a 2 vs 1 advantage, or are much more powerful, or spot a nice fresh noobish piece of land, and I think that's wrong, that's why I choose my targets strategically rather than by player/nation/odds...

So my ideal games would be no diplo no score graphs games, and those are very rare, actually there aren't any.