|
|
|
 |
|

January 4th, 2012, 11:01 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 435
Thanks: 18
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
Interesting, it appears that Ulm is winning the war against Pythium but loosing the game, although I propably made that choice during pretender creation.
|

January 6th, 2012, 03:45 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 435
Thanks: 18
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
I placed a preventive delay, as both Pythium and Shinuyama indicated to have some heavy real life workloads.
|

January 6th, 2012, 04:30 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 351
Thanks: 12
Thanked 54 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mightypeon
I placed a preventive delay, as both Pythium and Shinuyama indicated to have some heavy real life workloads.
|
Much obliged.
|

January 10th, 2012, 07:04 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 435
Thanks: 18
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
A lot happened in this turn, and we may have a found a sub in Numahr, I am delaying things for 72 hours.
|

January 14th, 2012, 09:41 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 449
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
We're coming up on 48 hours until the turn hosts, and the potential sub has had 4 days to look things over. Can we get a decision one way or the other?
|

January 15th, 2012, 04:46 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 435
Thanks: 18
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
This is most likely indeed.
|

January 15th, 2012, 06:13 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 351
Thanks: 12
Thanked 54 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
I sent the sub a full host of details concerning the game, the politics and his assets and he hasn't responded with a definitive "yes" or "no". If he's not interested, I'm probably going to divvy up my assets and go AI. This game has been great and challenging but my involvement in it is already past the time I have to dedicate to it. Unless a sub shows up real soon, my vote is for Pythium to get dumb and overrun (of course, you could argue this has been going on for a while, what with my steady losing streak to Ulm  ).
|

January 15th, 2012, 10:45 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 294
Thanks: 7
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
I can set Ctis AI and switch to Pythium if no one has a problem with it. I believe once I've gone AI as one nation I can switch to another without the server freaking out.
|

January 15th, 2012, 10:48 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 351
Thanks: 12
Thanked 54 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
Suites me fine. I can play this turn while tratorix makes C'tis go AI, then tratorix can take over Pythium from there. Once this is the confirmed course of action, I will message all the tips and diplomacy info I have to tratorix.
|

January 16th, 2012, 06:37 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 435
Thanks: 18
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
I fully agree with this.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|