French Para Obat error?

[DRG]

Originally Posted by Weasel

I will go through the maps and get rid of the messed up ones, starting at 300. Changing the slot is pretty easy too. As for theme, I never knew the maps were applicable to WW2 or MBT, I use them all in both versions the most important thing to me is the size and whether a stupid river is present.

***I just went through the first 20 and noticed something strange. At map 319 Canadian and Arab flags suddenly appeared in the water, opened 320 and they were still there in the same spot. Exited the editor and opened it again and the flags were gone from those maps. So far I have not found any with anything wrong in them.***

Don't worry about the maps. I've got what I need for this release

Don

[DRG]

All those sceanrios are dated 9/89 except Xroads at Lubbecke which is shows as 7/82 France vs Czech in scenhack...which is reading the scenario data....but the write up says September 2nd 1989......I ASSUME 9/89 is correct if yes, I've already corrected it,

[DRG]

Originally Posted by Weasel

I will go through the maps and get rid of the messed up ones, starting at 300. Changing the slot is pretty easy too. As for theme, I never knew the maps were applicable to WW2 or MBT, I use them all in both versions the most important thing to me is the size and whether a stupid river is present.

*

I generally don't think of "Stalingrad" as an MBT map just as I wouldn't put a Huế map in WW2. The player can do anything he wants the maps are interchangable between games

[Weasel]

Yes, that was an error when moving to new slot, 9/89 is correct.

[DRG]

Played the Belgian one last night. It's always fun to drop three T-80's into the canal when you nail the bridge they are sitting on with arty. I was working Leos in behind the ones that were left when the game ended.

Don

[Weasel]

What was the outcome? I never put my tanks bumper to bumper, always at least 50m between afvs but you were playing the AI eh?

Did you want me to keep going through the maps for errant ones or are you doing it? If me, how would you like them numbered?

[Suhiir]

I try REAL hard to never have vehicles end their turn on a bridge.

[Weasel]

Me too, stop before or after but DRG was playing the AI I believe.

[DRG]

Originally Posted by Weasel

What was the outcome? I never put my tanks bumper to bumper, always at least 50m between afvs but you were playing the AI eh?

Did you want me to keep going through the maps for errant ones or are you doing it? If me, how would you like them numbered?

High marginal victory for me as the Belgians. I tend to play like Gräbner on Arnhem bridge but I was holding back expecting the horde to show up at any moment but it was managable and I was bored and crossed the bridge in the "north" and started roaming around looking for trouble. I also re-situated the Strikers for greater concelment and wider range of view..........also.. I just noticed that game says these are Dutch.. They are Begians.... did you include the wrong TXT file ??

Red Army 1 - Forcing the Elbe*
Designed for SPMBT V9.1*
Designed for head to head, against AI human should play Russia*
*
Date: September 1st 1989; 0530*
*
Battle Location: The Elbe Canal near Uelzen, West Germany, opposite Dutch Forces*
*
Battle Type: Dutch Defend vs Russian Assault*
*

They are Belgians defending the canal

and yes it WOULD play better H2H but against the AI it's a good quick game to play

[Weasel]

Belgian. Just reading the write up again, I say Dutch up top and Belgian in the write up. Must have been because I was writing them all up at once or something...brain cramp.

That is why I was glad that Walrus was willing to play test the games over and over after mods and such. As Russia he got a draw and I got a marginal as them. Will never be 100% equal just due to player ability.