|
|
|
|
 |
May 5th, 2004, 07:21 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: SCs other than the vq
Quote:
Originally posted by Gandalf Parker:
quote:
Originally posted by archaeolept:
quote:
I have removed those Posts
|
omg, all sorts of Posts in this thread are missing, includer Jasper's original "troll". How are people to make sense of a complex multi-leveled argument if the historical record is wiped clean? I've seen this happen before in forums; never w/ good results.
Surgical is sloppy but better than losing a whole topic that has good information in it.
Everything has its pros and cons.
[ May 06, 2004, 08:04: Message edited by: Zen ] |
May 5th, 2004, 07:40 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: SCs other than the vq
Wyrm could, in fact, have magical weapons, but as Astral Weapon is anastral spell it would be quite a risk... A new low.level spell giving mage and/or block of units magical weapons would be nice.
|
May 5th, 2004, 08:31 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: SCs other than the vq
Giving immortality to SC-capable pretender probably wasn't such a hot idea. Giving it to the one with earthrealness, two resistances, inherant lifedrain, and flying is something that should probably be looked at. Sort of like when the developers made an immortal unit for Vanheim, they chose the boar and not the Van. Immortal Vans are not impossible to overcome, however, this does not make them a strong balance decision.
[ May 06, 2004, 05:07: Message edited by: Blitz ]
|
May 5th, 2004, 10:39 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: SCs other than the vq
Deleting other people's Posts? I didn't even think that was possible.
Certainly seems like a bad move to me. There have been far more rude and offensive Posts in other threads. This Last one may have been inaccurate, but if it was really deleted, then ya, I agree it would stink big-time to have Posts deleted if they weren't totally out of place (as in, threats, curses, very hurtful words, illegal stuff).
PvK
|
May 5th, 2004, 10:43 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SCs other than the vq
-You- can't delete other people's Posts. Moderators can.
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|
May 5th, 2004, 10:49 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: SCs other than the vq
Did Gandalf really delete other people's Posts in this case? I'd be pretty shocked if he did, since I don't recall anything being really out of line.
Deleting and editing ones' own Posts though is pretty common on this forum, although in some cases it can make it tough to figure out what happened.
PvK
|
May 5th, 2004, 10:50 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: SCs other than the vq
That is, it's often much better to add an apology and/or disclaimer to a regrettable post, than to remove the text.
PvK
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
