Mini Tiny BUGFIX Wishlist for Next Patch

[tinkthank]

Boron said:

Those 2 things are not bugfixes but nerfings to already rarely used spells .
Call of Wilds already costs 15!!!! nature gems and can't beat more then 5-10 PD .
So why the forest restriction ? It would nerf the spell into oblivion probably .

I never ever summoned a Hama Dryad . 5 for 10 Nature gems ?
For that i get 6+ Lamia Queens or 10+ Vine Ogres , both spells require nature 3 to cast also .
I can't think of any situation in which the Hama Dryads would be more useful then the 10 gems invested in Vine Ogres or Lamias instead .

No, they are bugs if you look at the descriptions.
The fact that you do not use them or many other things is besides the point!

[alexti]

tinkthank said:
No, they are bugs if you look at the descriptions.

So where are those bugs? In description or in the code?

[tinkthank]

alexti said:

So where are those bugs? In description or in the code?

I'm a big "descriptions" fan -- it is, after all, what we can see. Therefore, bugs are always in the code!

[Boron]

tinkthank said:
No, they are bugs if you look at the descriptions.
The fact that you do not use them or many other things is besides the point!

I would rather say the description is incorrect and fix the description .

[Endoperez]

I think that limiting Fairy Trod and Call of the Wild to forest provinces would make them more thematic, and allow lowering their price or making them more powerful.

Generally, I think that the descriptions show what Illwinter would like the game to be like, and the code is the implementation that doesn't always match the ideal. But it could also be because Johan and Kristoffer disagreed...