Incorrect research for Sage?

Endoperez · #1 March 2nd, 2006, 02:36 AM

It would be nice if research value listed the bonuses, and the sources of the change, as e.g. defence does.

Agrajag · #2 March 2nd, 2006, 11:56 AM

Quote:

Endoperez said:
It would be nice if research value listed the bonuses, and the sources of the change, as e.g. defence does.

It would also be nice if random paths were detailed in the unit desctiption. (IE Full Random, Sorcery or Elemental)

OG_Gleep · #3 March 3rd, 2006, 08:30 AM

I second that emotion. Even a color coded question mark would work.

NTJedi · #4 March 6th, 2006, 03:12 PM

I agree with the color coded question mark for identifying the types of random paths.

Cainehill · #5 March 6th, 2006, 03:27 PM

Also - it'd be kinda neat if there were actually more complexity in the random paths in Dom3 - Abysia's native mages being less likely to get Water, Ermor's being less likely to get Nature, Jotun's not getting fire, and R'lyeh not getting any non-astral at all.

Chazar · #6 March 7th, 2006, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Cainehill said:
Also - it'd be kinda neat if there were actually more complexity in the random paths in Dom3 - Abysia's native mages being less likely to get Water, Ermor's being less likely to get Nature, Jotun's not getting fire, and R'lyeh not getting any non-astral at all.

A nice and thematic idea (mostly

)! However the problem with this is that Forum-aware long-term players immediately may gain an advantage from this knowledge (like the sorcery-only/elemtal-only) picks if it is not displayed somewhere within the game.

I think things a these confuse newbie as well. All easy information should be easily accessible! Color-coded question marks for everyone! Huzzah!

OG_Gleep · #7 March 9th, 2006, 11:12 AM

Isn't this the place to be if you want a MP game? Everytime I mention Dominions to others, I get a puzzled response.