Dominions 3 development news

Caduceus · #1 June 27th, 2006, 10:39 PM

I love the 1 minute (probably less) between posts by Kristoffer. Heh.

ioticus · #2 June 28th, 2006, 12:45 AM

I have a hard time believing that they would decide in advance how many updates the game should have before it goes gold. How can you arbitrarily decide that? It would seem to me that you would simply decide to go gold after most all known bugs (at least the major ones) are fixed.

Archonsod · #3 June 28th, 2006, 07:14 AM

Quote:

ioticus said:
I have a hard time believing that they would decide in advance how many updates the game should have before it goes gold. How can you arbitrarily decide that? It would seem to me that you would simply decide to go gold after most all known bugs (at least the major ones) are fixed.

Um, you set a given criteria for a version increment, then say the game will be ready for release at version xxx

DominionsFan · #4 June 28th, 2006, 11:33 AM

Aw..I wanted to try out Dominions 3. before I go on holiday in mid july, but I guess the game wont be out before august.

ioticus · #5 June 28th, 2006, 11:41 AM

Quote:

DominionsFAN said:
Aw..I wanted to try out Dominions 3. before I go on holiday in mid july, but I guess the game wont be out before august.

Yeah, the game looks to be at least another month away

Nerfix · #6 June 28th, 2006, 11:55 AM

I told you guys not to get too optimistic.

NakedLunch · #7 June 28th, 2006, 12:00 PM

Must...finish...preview...before...game is...released!

Varjostin · #8 June 28th, 2006, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Nerfix said:
I told you guys not to get too optimistic.

Yeah yeah. It's sad that the cynics and pessimists are always right in the end. It would be fair and equal, if the optimists were right even once. World would be a better place too.

Fate · #9 June 28th, 2006, 05:47 PM

Quote:

ioticus said:

Quote:

DominionsFAN said:
Aw..I wanted to try out Dominions 3. before I go on holiday in mid july, but I guess the game wont be out before august.

Yeah, the game looks to be at least another month away

The way I was told to make timelines (I have done some small programming) was to estimate how long it would take and triple it to account for debugging.

How they number the versions seems quite simple. When you think you have done enough to qualify for a new version, you say it is a new version. Bugs get fixed easily? That version comes faster. New bugs crop up? That version comes slower.

ioticus · #10 June 28th, 2006, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Archonsod said:

Um, you set a given criteria for a version increment, then say the game will be ready for release at version xxx

Are you saying the list of bugs is known in advance and then it is decided which and how many of those bugs would constitute a new version number? For example, if there are 10 known bugs, it could be decided to fix 2 bugs (those bugs and correponding version number(s) being selected in advance!) per version, thus going gold after 5 versions? If that is the case, then how do you handle bugs that crop up unexpectedly? I would assume new bugs would be "tacked on" to new version numbers as needed.