|
|
|
|
|
View Poll Results: What conceptual balance changes, specifically, make a negative impact?
|
|
Changes to booster items and/or indy commanders (removed next version in any case).
|
   
|
31 |
28.97% |
|
Adding hoof and light lance attacks to light cavalry.
|
  
|
6 |
5.61% |
|
Higher research for forge of the ancients, more gems for tartarians.
|
  
|
5 |
4.67% |
|
Increased Prince of Death cost and Cyclops new path cost.
|
  
|
6 |
5.61% |
|
Magic scale back to dom2 settings.
|
  
|
15 |
14.02% |
|
Recruitable reanimators nerf (Lanka and ME Ermor).
|
  
|
16 |
14.95% |
|
Cost increases to helhirdlings, sacred van cavalry, shadow vestals, and palankasha.
|
|
8 |
7.48% |
|
T'ien Ch'i celestial masters should have 10 in every path.
|
|
10 |
9.35% |
|
Other (please specify).
|
|
6 |
5.61% |
|
None of the above.
|
|
4 |
3.74% |
 |
December 22nd, 2007, 06:35 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 4
Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Balance opinions II
YOU KNOW MY VOTE!
Edit: Nooooooooo I voted the wrong one, I thought it said which changes would you like to see most >_>.
|
December 22nd, 2007, 09:29 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Balance opinions II
I think the magic scale is plenty powerful enough in Dom3, I can't see why you'd want to set it back to Dom2 level. I always feel very powerful with Magic-3, and quite crippled with Drain-3.
|
December 22nd, 2007, 09:52 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Balance opinions II
Two reasons: The scale settings that do almost nothing border on buggy, and a more powerful magic scale makes extreme blessings harder.
As for the celestial master, it was a non-serious option, though I suppose it does serve to see how many people did not read the poll carefully/were not actually familiar with CB.
|
December 23rd, 2007, 06:25 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,449
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Balance opinions II
I thought you meant that the celestials should have an extra 10% of getting F/A/W/E/S/D/N/B.
Though I didn't vote for it anyway, so it doesn't really matter what I thought 
__________________
I'm in the IDF. (So any new reply by me is a very rare event.)
|
December 23rd, 2007, 06:48 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 90
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Balance opinions II
On a poll the wording is very important otherwise people will vote for the wrong thing. Thats why politicians argue over the wording on any referendum poll.
|
December 23rd, 2007, 07:00 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Balance opinions II
Quote:
Two reasons: The scale settings that do almost nothing border on buggy, and a more powerful magic scale makes extreme blessings harder.
|
I guess I can see that. But magic-3 giving +3 research sounds insane! I think that would be a major turnoff for me, since I can't imagine ever not taking it - which feels like a loss of choice. |
December 23rd, 2007, 07:07 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: France (Paris)
Posts: 227
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Balance opinions II
I agree, a +3 research bonus is a no brainer
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
