Dominions Nations Evaluations ;)

thejeff · #1 July 18th, 2008, 05:29 PM

Agreed. I think it's clear to all that LA Ermor and R'lyeh are powerhouses.
The other eras are closer.

And it's very hard to draw any conclusions about the low end. Where there are multiple nations that haven't won at all.

Tifone · #2 July 18th, 2008, 09:24 PM

But they're just so thematically KOOOOOOOL!!!!

triqui · #3 July 19th, 2008, 01:44 AM

Some of the strong nations are as well thematically cool (ermor MA is a good example imho). Some nations that are very low end are not the "coolest" ones thematically as well. So that's not a cause-effect relationship.

Endoperez · #4 July 19th, 2008, 03:34 AM

Quote:

triqui said:
Some of the strong nations are as well thematically cool (ermor MA is a good example imho). Some nations that are very low end are not the "coolest" ones thematically as well. So that's not a cause-effect relationship.

But then, some of the low-end nation are very cool. EA Agartha is awesome...

triqui · #5 July 19th, 2008, 08:06 AM

To add an extra evaluations:

MA Shinuyama: 2-5-4-2-2. (weak army for early expansion, lack of sacreds and low morale make them attractive nation to be rushed. Later, they have access to very strong army buffs and one of the best, if not the best, and more cost effective mages in the game which happen to be non-capital. Late game they have strong Death which means strong thugs and Tartarian factory, and easy access to game-winning BE like Army of Gold+Heat from hell)

Wrana · #6 July 26th, 2008, 05:13 PM

Bump?

JimMorrison · #7 July 27th, 2008, 05:16 AM

This thread kind of bobs up and down a bit.

I really should edit those first posts to reflect my easing of the restrictions for posting ratings.

I guess I just overestimated the number of oldtimers who would find this interesting enough to take the time.

Hmmmm, maybe this will finally get me to drag myself into IRC and bug some people there.