.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Air Assault Task Force- Save $8.00
Bronze- Save $10.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 23rd, 2001, 07:31 PM

rdouglass rdouglass is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Biddeford, ME, USA
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
rdouglass is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Unrealistic Movement Point System

Not really. I can get up to 12 MP's per ship using Q engines and Solar Sails III. That'll take me clear across a system in 1 "month". I just need another MP to get thru a WP.

In some Sci-Fi in the 'near' future it takes a long time to move across a system. Didn't it take 13 months in the movie "Mission to Mars" (which was a pretty cheesy movie BTW)?And didn't it take quite a few years to travel to Jupiter in 2001? Granted they didn't have WP's but isn't there this thing called "artistic license"?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 23rd, 2001, 09:36 PM
DirectorTsaarx's Avatar

DirectorTsaarx DirectorTsaarx is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 1,048
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
DirectorTsaarx is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Unrealistic Movement Point System

And don't forget the fact that you can make multiple 180 degree turns during each PHASE of combat!

And most stories that allow for fast travel through a solar system also allow faster-than-light travel, thus allowing ships to move between star systems without having to use warp points (or jumpgates or whatever).
__________________
L++ Se+++ GdY $++ Fr C+++ Csc Sf Ai AuO M+ MpTM S Ss RRSHP+ Pw- Fq->Fq+ Nd+++ Rp G++ Mm++ Bb---
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old January 23rd, 2001, 09:40 PM

Barnacle Bill Barnacle Bill is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Somewhere on the wine-dark sea...
Posts: 236
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Barnacle Bill is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Unrealistic Movement Point System

As I understand (simplified), a "real" mars mission you would burn your engines long enough to change your orbital velocity around the sun from "equal to the Earth" to "equal to Mars". Your orbital distance then increases (slowly) to the same as Mars. If you time it right (what they call a "launch window", you end up in the orbit of Mars at the same location Mars occupies when you get there. This takes you on an eliptical course between Earth and Mars, and takes months (maybe around a year), as I recall. Of course in most science fiction games we have some drive that runs all the time and somehow generates velocity as long as it is on, and it looks like SE4 has that, too. It certainly doesn't seem to work "realistically".

Let's forget about the outer solar system for a moment and just deal with the part from Jupiter in. Jupiter is 778140000 km from the sun. So, to get the sun in the center and Jupiter on the map, our system map has to at least twice that, 1556280000 km. As I recall, in Starfire a speed of "6" represents 0.1c, where c = speed of light = 299792 km/sec. At 0.1c, it would take about 14.4 hours to cross our "big enough for Jupiter" system map. If we increase our map so it is big enough to get Pluto on, now it is 11826000000 km across and it takes our ship about 109.6 hours (about 4.5 days) to cross the map. 0.1c is really, really fast, though. When it shut down its engines after the burn to escape Earth orbit and head out for the moon, Apollo 11 had a velocity of 35,579 ft/sec, which is about 10.8 km/sec or about 0.000036c. At that speed, it would take about 4.5 years to get across our "big enough for Jupiter" map, and about 34.5 years to get accross our "big enough for Pluto" map. Voyager 2 has a velocity (relative to Earth) of about 39.4 km/sec. That would take 1.25 years to cross our "big enough for Jupiter" map, and about 9.5 years to get accross our "big enough for Pluto" map.

Another way of looking at it is that you could probably create a decent space 4X game that all stayed in one solar system.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old January 23rd, 2001, 10:03 PM

apache apache is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
apache is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Unrealistic Movement Point System

Thats a much simplifed, but more or less accurate description of orbital mechanics Barnacle Bill. Anyways, by doing orbital transfers, you save an immense amount of fuel, and thus spacecraft mass. That is the big deal with 20th century (and 21st century) space flight. You actually could fly a direct route to Mars from Earth, but it would mean expending a lot more fuel, though it would mean you get there much quicker.
However, 25th century space flight (according to the game) apparently uses some form of non-intertial propulsion, meaning fuel and spacecraft mass is irrelvant, and you can turn on a dime.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 23rd, 2001, 10:04 PM

SirDarwin SirDarwin is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Ottawa,Ontario
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SirDarwin is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Unrealistic Movement Point System

Aren't we getting technical
Also I woudln't call SEIV a near future game, but then again this isn't a realistic game to begin with

It is suppose to be fun, personally I never even thought about how the movement worked in the game until I saw this topic
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old January 23rd, 2001, 10:25 PM
Alpha Kodiak's Avatar

Alpha Kodiak Alpha Kodiak is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ, USA
Posts: 921
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Alpha Kodiak is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Unrealistic Movement Point System

One aspect of reality that we lose in the game is that solar systems are not static. The planet locations relative to each are constantly changing. During the time involved for even one turn, the planets would move in relation to each other.

While I'm not suggesting that the SEIV game system should be modified to reflect this, (talk about a programming nightmare!) the discussion of the realism of movement points should probably be tempered by the fact that the premise of movement within the system is inherently flawed. The game is fun, as stated before, but we will never get realistic movement with a static system model.
__________________
My SEIV Code: L++++ GdY $ Fr+++ C-- S* T? Sf Tcp A%% M+++ MpT RV Pw+ Fq Nd- RP+ G++ Au+ Mm++(--)

Ursoids of the Galaxy, unite!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old January 23rd, 2001, 11:16 PM

Barnacle Bill Barnacle Bill is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Somewhere on the wine-dark sea...
Posts: 236
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Barnacle Bill is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Unrealistic Movement Point System

Again, it is all a matter of how complex you want it to be. Also a matter of what assumptions you want to make about future tech. That was my point, and why I mentioned everything from Starfire speeds down to "real life" current spacecraft.

In Starfire they do provide the option to track moving bodies within the solar system, etc... Actually it is kind of weird. Computers seemingly offer the ability to make a more complex game playable, but no computer 4X game I've ever seen approaches the complexity of even the current 4th edition of Starfire (which is greatly simplified compared to late 2nd & early 3rd edition rules).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.