|
|
|
 |

May 1st, 2003, 09:14 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: In the diaspora.
Posts: 578
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter
Wow, an Imperial Star Destroyer is really big.
What's up with that Romulan Warbird or Deridex or something? Isn't it too big?
I don't remember them to be that big in Bridge Kommander.
__________________
--------------------
--------------------
--------------------
--------------------
When somebody says he is going to kill you.........believe him. -Holocaust survivor
.
|

May 1st, 2003, 09:18 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter
Quote:
Originally posted by Katchoo:
Hehehe
I can re-enact the Hindinburgh disaster on this page...
Ok, so it's the Hindinburgh crashing on Cloud City...
|
I made Kong climb the Empire State Building. 
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

May 1st, 2003, 09:22 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: In the diaspora.
Posts: 578
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter
Is it there any chance that the kts in SE4 may be also taken as the lenght?
If a 500 kt Cruiser would also be 500m long, then we would be closer to sci-fi mainstream...... 
__________________
--------------------
--------------------
--------------------
--------------------
When somebody says he is going to kill you.........believe him. -Holocaust survivor
.
|

May 1st, 2003, 09:39 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: In the diaspora.
Posts: 578
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter
Quote:
Originally posted by geoschmo:
I made Kong climb the Empire State Building.
|
hehe, I tried to make him fall but he doesn't wanna turn upside down..... 
__________________
--------------------
--------------------
--------------------
--------------------
When somebody says he is going to kill you.........believe him. -Holocaust survivor
.
|

May 1st, 2003, 09:41 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,592
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter
__________________
It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. - Voltaire
|

May 5th, 2003, 05:09 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Garden-Variety State
Posts: 356
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter
Quote:
Originally posted by Gwaihir:
Those are way off for the Eclipse vs. the SSD - the eclipse is 17500m and the SSD is 8000m, yet they are shown as basically the same size.
|
Actually, the Executor class IS about the same size as the Eclipse. See these pages for details:
http://www.theforce.net/swtc/ssd5mile.html
http://www.theforce.net/swtc/ssd.html#size
__________________
Hail Caesar!
L+ GdY $? Fr! C- SdS T!+ Sf+ Tcp A% M++ MpM R!- Pw+ Fq-- Nd-- RP+ G++
|

May 5th, 2003, 06:58 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 109
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter
I stand corrected. Thank you very much, good stuff to know. I really like how detailed the site's analysis is. I saw a similar one a while back debunking a myth about the death star. (and another one discussing how the second death star's explosion would have destroyed Endor's ecology - either from fallout or from fall-on (big chunks landing as meteorite strikes - no matter how generously you estimate it, there would be enough of them for nuclear winter (i think that's the gist of it) ) It was very detailed, got all the technical stuff covered, and was fun to read.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|