Woe, to be an Ice-ish race...

[PvK]

People who worry so much about what planet/atmosphere type has an advantage are wasting too much of their attention on too unimportant an aspect of play, IMO.

PvK

[Fyron]

and have a greater chance to hold ruins than other planet types.

A rock planet is no more or less likely than an ice or gas one to have ruins on it.

[Ragnarok]

Originally posted by PvK:
People who worry so much about what planet/atmosphere type has an advantage are wasting too much of their attention on too unimportant an aspect of play, IMO.

PvK

Very true. You will all fall before my might empire no matter what your planet/atmosphere type is.

I like to think so at least.

[Taera]

well you do care, you care what atmosphere they breathe so you might conquer their planets

[geoschmo]

Originally posted by Dingocat85:

quote:

---

Originally posted by DESDINOVA:
I usually trade starmaps for the colonization techs.

Does the AI really value Starmaps so much, that you can trade just a few of them for a Colonization Tech - one of the most expensive techs in the game?

---

Not only this, but the AI is so stupid they will trade you colonization tech for a handfull of starmaps THEY ALREADY HAVE. You can keep giving them the same maps over and over again and they'll happily accept them in trade. If their mood is such that they will accept trades from you in the first place.

One nice thing to choosing ice in solo games is the AI doesn't get mad at you as quickly if you have a different planet type then they do.

Geoschmo

[Krsqk]

I prefer to trade things like Satellites lvl 1, Weapons Platforms lvl 1, Ship Construction lvl 1, and four or five other assorted level 1 starting techs. It usually works. So does trading twelve levels of Space Yards when you only have one. Of course, I rarely take advantage of the AI like this (unless I'm playing at a severe disadvantage).

[PvK]

Sigh...