|
|
|
 |

July 26th, 2003, 02:03 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,592
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star survey reaches 70 sextillion
Quote:
Originally posted by Narf'scompatshop:
not all the atoms in the universe are hydrogen. most, i guess but not all.
|
Number of all other atoms is completely negligeable. Less than a tiny fraction of percent.
__________________
It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. - Voltaire
|

July 26th, 2003, 03:05 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brazil
Posts: 827
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star survey reaches 70 sextillion
Here's how it goes, AFAIK : million, billion, trillion, quadrillion, quintillion, sextillion, septillion, octillion, nonillion, decillion. This sequence uses the Latin roots for numbers, not the Greek roots (tetra-, penta-, hexa-, hepta-).
Speaking a Latin language can be handy once in a very great while.
And 'milliard' is actually a French term which was borrowed by British English.
[ July 26, 2003, 14:08: Message edited by: Erax ]
__________________
Have you ever had... the sudden feeling... that God is out to GET YOU?
Well, my girl dumped me and I'm stuck with the raftmates from Hell in the middle of the sea and... what was the question again???
|

July 26th, 2003, 03:52 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,518
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star survey reaches 70 sextillion
Right. So. For American English at least, and for the truly pedantic nerds among us -- (The applicant for your consideration as the biggest nerd speaking here, ahem) -- the list would go like this:
(Wish I knew how to set the small font like everyone else does)
10^3 thousand
10^6 million,
10^9 billion,
10^12 trillion,
10^15 quadrillion,
10^18 quintillion,
10^21 sextillion,
10^24 septillion,
10^27 octillion,
10^30 nonillion,
10^33 decillion
10^36 undecillion
10^39 dodecillion
Insert - 10^40, number of hydrogen atoms in the universe, we guess (well astrophysicists, not me personally)
10^42 tridecilion
Insert - 10^44, number of seconds in the lifetime of the universe, we guess
10^45 quadecilion
10^48 quintdecillion
10^51 sexdecillion
10^54 septdecillion
10^57 octdecillion
10^60 nondecillion
10^63 eicoillion
Insert - 10^64, energy, in joules, of the Big Bang, we guess, unless someone was there. (anyone?)
10^66 uneicoillion
Insert - Official beginning of numbers that have no meaning to human minds
|

July 26th, 2003, 06:40 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Star survey reaches 70 sextillion
Quote:
Insert - Official beginning of numbers that have no meaning to human minds
|
Actually, numbers greater than 4 have no meaning to the human mind. Every number beyond that is thought of as sets of 4s (including partial 4s). Of course, this is at the most basic level of thinking, and we are obviously quite capable of fooling ourselves into thinking we can comprehend big numbers. 
|

July 26th, 2003, 06:45 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,518
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star survey reaches 70 sextillion
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
quote: Insert - Official beginning of numbers that have no meaning to human minds
|
Actually, numbers greater than 4 have no meaning to the human mind. Every number beyond that is thought of as sets of 4s (including partial 4s). Of course, this is at the most basic level of thinking, and we are obviously quite capable of fooling ourselves into thinking we can comprehend big numbers. Huh
I mean to say, ... huh?
Wait, I'm fascinated now. Where does 4 come as the basic unit of human math capacity.
I saw on t.v. that tacky movie Darryl Hannah and the clan of the cave bear, and she could count higher than the head geek neandertal, but seriously who came up with the 4 thing?
|

July 26th, 2003, 07:26 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,903
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star survey reaches 70 sextillion
Only 4? Surely humans can comprehend numbers bigger than 4 ??
If we're talking about numbers we can visualize in our minds, I think it's bigger than 4 but probably less than 100. I can visualize geometric shapes like triangle, square, pentagon, hexagon, and octagon, so I know I can visualize at least up to 8. I can visualize the image of two hands, with 10 fingers, so I know I can visualize 10. Or a dozen eggs for 12.
Then in my mind I can picture a group of, say 5 octagons arranged in a pentagon pattern, which make 40 sides, and so on. But it does get more difficult when the number gets much bigger than that.
|

July 26th, 2003, 07:31 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Star survey reaches 70 sextillion
I did not mean pictures, I meant the numerical concept of 4 itself.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|