RTH has filled all slots; discuss the game here!

[Cirvol]

primitive, i didnt missunderstand look at my earlier post...

Originally posted by Cirvol:
yeah, good point about 'no turtling'

the way i read that = you must be able to fly to any system

thats it

IE, if you make a guantlet of warp points and a single 'string' path to get to your deepest systems, so be it

all the hub-bub about 10 warp points and grav shields has nothing to do with my simple post - which most accurately describes the no turtle rule

[primitive]

Yeah, that post sums it up pretty well.

If your strategy for RTH2 is to confuse me, then you are doing great so far

[Ragnarok]

I think just for clearifications sake I will add this.

I don't think it was defined as well as it could have been in this regard. Cirvol mentions having a way to get from system to system no matter what. This is true, and it is required.

I think it is understood, but as I said, just to make things clearer.
You cannot close off a single system and leave the rest open, this would be considered turtelling. If I, or someone else, were to come into a players cluster we must be able to get to all of his warp points by means of a warp point system.

[Cirvol]

bump

i just got my first stellar manip ship - what about the rest of you?

how many do you all generally build in rth?
fill me in on the 'common wisdom' gained in rth 1?

[Ragnarok]

Originally posted by Cirvol:

fill me in on the 'common wisdom' gained in rth 1?

Why would we do that?

In RTH1 I had I think 4 warp open/closers. Then I had whole slu (10 or so, IIRC) planet creators. This was since we used FQM there were at least 15 asteroid fields in each system!

[Spoo]

Will the game break if I try to convert one of the "invisible" asteroid fields into a planet?

[Ragnarok]

Originally posted by Spoo:
Will the game break if I try to convert one of the "invisible" asteroid fields into a planet?

"invisible" asteroid fields?! What is this you speak of?