.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
The Star and the Crescent- Save $9.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 27th, 2004, 06:00 AM

Baron Munchausen Baron Munchausen is offline
General
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Baron Munchausen is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Newtonian ships or not?.

Quote:
Originally posted by Randallw:
quote:
Originally posted by Baron Munchausen:
In order to 'maneuver like a plane' there would have to be an atmosphere for wings to work on. Or alternatively, you need to be moving at a signifigant fraction of the speed of light in order to get similar effects from the 'vacuum' of space
Ha, I knew saying plane, someone would think of spaceships with wings . Let me use examples to show what I mean. Hard Science ship, a ship that accelerates at a fraction of c and needs to do stuff like turn halfway through the journet to decelerate. Pulp ships, the good old Star Wars or Star trek ship. Disregarding their faster than light speed, when they move at sublight speed they can turn whenever they want and stop suddenly without regard to inertia.
Planes don't move without inertia. You are talking about something completely unknown and probably impossible, but yes we do see that in many shows like Star Trek. This is 'simplified' SciFi for the sake of making a short and simple television show or movie.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old March 27th, 2004, 07:34 AM
President_Elect_Shang's Avatar

President_Elect_Shang President_Elect_Shang is offline
Brigadier General
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: WA
Posts: 1,894
Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
President_Elect_Shang is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Newtonian ships or not?.

FTL via worm holes:
http://www.quantonics.com/Faster_Tha..._Discover.html

Good info:
http://www.lerc.nasa.gov/WWW/PAO/warp.htm

There should also be an article in the London Sunday Times on 4 Jan 2000 in which some US scientists managed to accelerate light pulses past the speed of light. I would have loved to include the link but the London Times charges for its archives. You guys just aren’t that important for me to start forking out my cash! Anyway I feel that one day we will have starships able to move faster than light. I am not saying that a human crew will be on it, maybe robots.
__________________
President Elect Shang; Tal-Re Republic of Free Worlds
Welcome to Super Vegeta’s Big Bang Attack… Welcome to OBLIVION!
“Don Panoz made an awesome car and… an incinerator” Bill Auberlen
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old March 27th, 2004, 07:42 AM

Phoenix-D Phoenix-D is offline
National Security Advisor
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Phoenix-D is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Newtonian ships or not?.

Actually it is possible to go past the speed of light, just not the speed of light -in a vaccum-. IIRC the 2000 experiment didn't break c, just the speed of light elsewhere.

There's actually a specific type of radiation that you get when you break the local speed of light, much like the shock waves when you break the speed of sound.

cherenkov radiation
__________________
Phoenix-D

I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
-Digger
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old March 27th, 2004, 08:52 AM
narf poit chez BOOM's Avatar

narf poit chez BOOM narf poit chez BOOM is offline
Shrapnel Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
narf poit chez BOOM is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Newtonian ships or not?.

Well, like I've said before, just maybe not on here, people once thought 60 miles an hour would tear the skin off your face. They thought the speed of sound was unbreakable. Well, I don't know how many other things we've done have been labeled impossible, but probably a lot.

I don't truly beleive that impossible is the right word...I think 'non-existant action/direction' is better, that is, if you think of any action we take as an action/direction, there are places you can go and places you can't and if you can't, it's not because you're blocked, it's because that action/direction doesn't exist.

Also, the nature of light itself lends some credence to the theory of holes? in or around or something the speed of light barrier.
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old March 28th, 2004, 02:20 AM

JurijD JurijD is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 122
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
JurijD is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Newtonian ships or not?.

acutally as I´ve said before... FTL travel doesn´t need to happen for us to clonize the galaxy. I´d say in a couple hundred years MAX technology will be developed enough to enable us to build giant ship that can travel at sub-light speeds and carry a couple 10-thousand people to the nearest solar systems. And if you give those people there say 100 years and then have them send out more ships... you could colonize the entire galaxy in a couple 100-thousand years... if we never develop FTL travel.

so the real question is: why hasn´t anyone done it yet) how come I don´t have a weird little green man for my neighbour... no wait I do.. at least the weird part

[ March 27, 2004, 12:22: Message edited by: JurijD ]
__________________
Quid pro quo <img border=0 title= alt=[Wink] src=wink.gif /]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old March 27th, 2004, 04:39 PM
capnq's Avatar

capnq capnq is offline
General
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 3,070
Thanks: 13
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
capnq is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Newtonian ships or not?.

Quote:
A ship with a skin made of thermocouples is an interesting concept.
The main problem is that a typical thermocouple only has an output of tens of microvolts. Other means of generating electricity are more efficient.
__________________
Cap'n Q

"Good morning, Pooh Bear," said Eeyore gloomily. "If it is a good morning," he said. "Which I doubt," said he.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old March 27th, 2004, 06:22 PM
Roanon's Avatar

Roanon Roanon is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 575
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Roanon is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Newtonian ships or not?.

Quote:
Originally posted by JurijD:
you could colonize the entire galaxy in a couple 100-thousand years...
100 to 1,000 years? 100,000 years? Oh well, what are a few powers of ten among friends...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.