Units that are way too cheap/expensive

[KevinRanger95]

Like the shilka, have they attempted to make the Tunguska a CS or ground support convoy gun

[shilka]

It works just fine when it comes to engage ground targets. *Nods* They can easy engage ground targets with both the main guns and the SAM missile. But the two systems Shilka vs Tunguska is like comparing a scooter with a racing bicycle

[JaM]

AA guns are not so effective in SPMBT. They are not capable fire AP targets at helos! Many times i hit Mi-24 with 35mm from Gepard without effect! in real Mi-24 would be anihilated from 35mm fire

[Suurajatollah]

Many seem to think that in real life Gepard and Tunguska would be able to shoot down an Apache or at least engage it in a more even fight. As we see. But in winspmbt it's not like that.

In my experience One Apache is worth propably thousands of points SPAA. So the costs of these two unit types do not match. Also, it doesn't match if we compare an Apache or any other modern attack helicopter to a modern battle tank. Again, the costs of these two unit types do not match. One solution is that Helicopters should cost much more in relation to tanks and anti aircraft. Another solution is that anti aircraft should be more effective.

I'd like to play with helicopters but with these flaws it would only spoil the gaming experience!

What do you think of the costs of those units mentioned up in this thread?

What are the units that are way too cheap/expensive?

And what should be done to correct the situation?