.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Air Assault Task Force- Save $8.00
winSPWW2- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > The Camo Workshop > WinSPMBT > TO&Es
Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 6th, 2005, 08:14 AM

SCAJolly SCAJolly is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 77
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SCAJolly is on a distinguished road
Default Re: PlasmaKrab

Hehehe, it's rather fun to see threads such as this one take leaps where it does, over the fence and then back in.
I stumbled over this report from RAND, well actually the link was given to me by another. It might be interesting, sketching up the general perception of a conflict before the US might interrupt.
http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1217/
Here, one also discusses the issue of China not having the amphibious strength to launch an invasion. The idea is that after securing sea- and air superiority, a reverse Dunkerque (sp?) is launched! Quite interesting, all of this.
God, I hate these smileys...
__________________
What would Cliff Richard do?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old February 3rd, 2009, 01:52 PM

mosborne mosborne is offline
Private
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
mosborne is on a distinguished road
Default Re: New chinese MBT

I think the comment "to what end" probably sums up the situation. It is ironic, since Chinese already conquered Taiwan, the losers took it when they lost the civil war in China. Now the winning side wants control of it. The operative word being "Control". I don't think it does the Chinese any good to ruin the Taiwan in its take over, no more than it would have made since for them to ruin Hong Kong in getting it back from the British. I would guess, that eventually, Tawain will go the way of Hong Kong. Just as it was mentioned that the US and China economies are intermixed, multiply that several times over when speaking of China and Taiwan. They are already one country but don't want to admit it yet. It would also eliminate a political hot spot for the US.

As for amphibious assault, I bet there have been many wars lost by assuming an opponent can't do something because they can't do the way they thought it should be done.

But I think I am contributing to getting this way off subject. I would be interested in knowing more about the new tank and its specs. Is there an official name for this tank now?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.