|
|
|
 |
|

September 22nd, 2005, 04:47 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Floating in space.
Posts: 2,297
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Revised Edition Star Trek
I have the technical manual for the Enterprise-D. So all your questions about that ship, I can answer. I've also seen every TNG episode ever made, all the movies, most of the Enterprise episodes, and quite a few Voyager episodes...
|

September 22nd, 2005, 05:10 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rockford, MN
Posts: 269
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Revised Edition Star Trek
I think I have the same book.
Cloak detection: Exhaust, Tachyons, or neither? I'm partial to the tachyon method myself. Anyone else, for or against?
|

September 22nd, 2005, 05:40 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Revised Edition Star Trek
Quote:
Wolfman77 said:
I think I have the same book.
Cloak detection: Exhaust, Tachyons, or neither? I'm partial to the tachyon method myself. Anyone else, for or against?
|
The thermodynamic impossibility of making it completely emissionless?
You can do pretty good, by limiting power generation and concentrating your emissions in hard-to-detect forms and directions, though.
You could also buffer the emissions temporarily... for thermal emissions, it would be like refridgerating the outer hull and pumping all the heat into a specially designed container until it melts down.
__________________
Things you want:
|

September 22nd, 2005, 05:47 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rockford, MN
Posts: 269
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Revised Edition Star Trek
I think, in one TNG episode they mentioned that they had mastered thermodynamics. Have they ever used thermal sensors to detect cloaked ships?
|

September 23rd, 2005, 01:27 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,903
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Revised Edition Star Trek
"Quadrant" means something different depending on which Star Trek series. In TOS, there were many many quadrants in the galaxy, but in STNG there are only four: Alpha, Beta, Delta, Gamma.
The linear warp speed scale of TOS made more sense than the warp-10 maximum scale later on. With the 10-maximum scale, it's hard to say how fast one warp factor is compared to another. For example, how much faster is warp 9.9 compared to warp 9.8? Is it just 1% faster, or is more like 10 times faster? How do you calculate the actual speed?
|

September 22nd, 2005, 05:11 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,389
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Revised Edition Star Trek
Anyone remember the original pilot for ST? Captain Pike (with Constitution Enterprise) had a crew of 150 or something like that although granted he lost a third of his crew somehow but still anyone remember that?
Although some people say it was not in fact the Constitution class enterprise but instead just a very similar hull configuration, like the "DReadnought" which was basically just an oversized constitution with three engines.
__________________
When life gives you lemons take them and squeeze them in life's eye until it gives you the oranges you asked for!
"If men build things to look like our penis such as towers and ships does that mean female achitects represent women having penis envy?"
A line that made me chuckle, I can't remember where I heard it I just know it made me laugh.
"I'm not really a slapper....I mainly punch and gouge."
Tammy Lee my kung fu instructor/sifu's daughter when asked if she ever slapped a boy for saying something nasty to her.
|

September 22nd, 2005, 05:18 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rockford, MN
Posts: 269
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Revised Edition Star Trek
I remember one where they put him on trial, I think. It's been a while so I might be completly confused. I don't remember and details though.
|

September 22nd, 2005, 05:27 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Floating in space.
Posts: 2,297
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Revised Edition Star Trek
Theoretically, it can be done for either. Tachyons are emitted by the cloaking device, which CAN be masked... The helium exhaust can just be placed in empty deutrium tanks.
|

September 23rd, 2005, 01:49 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 15,630
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Revised Edition Star Trek
Quote:
Starhawk said:
Anyone remember the original pilot for ST? Captain Pike (with Constitution Enterprise) had a crew of 150 or something like that although granted he lost a third of his crew somehow but still anyone remember that?
Although some people say it was not in fact the Constitution class enterprise but instead just a very similar hull configuration, like the "DReadnought" which was basically just an oversized constitution with three engines.
|
I have it on DVD. (Of course he would) They were attacked by some race on some planet and suffored a lot of casualities.
I saw the original B&W version when I was a kid. I thought to myself... they made this in the 60's, what visionaries.
They lost that visionary aspect of the show when they turned to treknobable.
__________________
Creator of the Star Trek Mod - AST Mod - 78 Ship Sets - Conquest Mod - Atrocities Star Wars Mod - Galaxy Reborn Mod - and Subterfuge Mod.
|

September 23rd, 2005, 08:57 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Searching for a holy grail.
Posts: 1,001
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Revised Edition Star Trek
I'd go for exhausts myself, there seems no reason for Tachyons other than they're a sci-fi standard. Everyone uses them when they need a clever particle.
Exhausts at least give you clever options and more to work with story wise, whereas if you start being consistent with tachyons cloaks are either easy to penetrate or very very hard to.
__________________
He who disagrees with me in private, call him a fool. He who disagrees with me in public, call him an ambulance.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|