OT: Star Trek 11 (?) news...

[Atrocities]

I sware to God if Superman has a giant spider in it, I will kill have to kill some...

Years ago when they first started to work on a new Superman story the creative consultant they brought on board was the fat dude who wrote and directed Clerks. I recently watched an HBO special of some of his speaking engagements and I have to say that he is one funny dude with some really interesting stories. One such story was about this producer who wanted giant spiders in superman. The superman gig fell through but this same produce went on to produce the abissmal Will Smith movie Wild Wild West. And guess what, it had a giant metal spider.

So who knows what kind of movie Superman will turn out to be. I am suprised that Superman wasn't made out to be a black gay man who grew up hating his father in an anti-social geo-political family.

I do have a question though, why is it that the Gay community always tries to promote that super hero's such as Superman, Batman, and such are gay? Superman is NOT gay, and while the Adam West version of Batman might be open to interpitation, the most recent Batman movie clearly proves that Batman is not gay. (They got us on Robin though, theres no getting away from that one.)

Spiderman is also not gay, strange and quite possibly a virgin, but most definatly not gay.

But back onto topic about Star Trek. If they do go ahead and make this "new" movie, as they are indicating they are planning to do, then all hope for a successful restart of the franchise is in question. Quite frankly they dropped the ball with Enterprise and UPN. (Don't get me started on UPN.)

Enterprise proved that there was no fan interest in a pre-TOS series or movie. Yet here we are, reading about some dumb *** yuppy produce trying to make what is essincially a pre-TOS series with TOS characters. This is without a doubt, one of the dummest dip**** things any one in hollywood has ever concieved of and the fact that they are seemingly going ahead with this project just proves that hollywood, especially Paramount Pictures, is way the hell out of touch with those who would be, and quite possibly are, its target audiance. WE DON'T WANT A REMAKE OF TOS! Give us something new, not something old made into something new.

[NullAshton]

So... let them produce the movie, let them fail horribly at it, and let them learn their lesson because of the few hundred million or more dollars they lost. Not like we lose anything.

[Caduceus]

I wish they would move on... What about the "time division" of Starfleet?

[Black_Knyght]

Trek's New Nemesis ?

The Insider, the syndicated gossip TV series, reported rumors that the liberal young producers of J.J. Abrams' pending 11th Star Trek movie have proposed some radical new additions to the script. The newest enemy of the Federation is slated be a completely new race of intelligent arachnoids, in gigantic spidery ships, bent on destroying the existing timelines and rewriting the history of the universe in their own image.

Citing an anonymous source, it is also reported that Abrams (Mission: Impossible III) is seriously considering a gay affair between Damon's younger Kirk and an as yet uncast Spock. He's sought support from the original Kirk, William Shatner. "Shatner gave his blessing," the source reportedly told the show. "J.J. got his approval, he really loves the idea."

Just kidding.........

[Atrocities]

That would actually be the next big thing... ROFLMAO ... you should post that on TrekBB or other sites... it is quite believable.

[Black_Knyght]

Black_Knyght said:

Just kidding.........

Is this the future-past of Star Trek ???

[dogscoff]

Atrocities said:
the fat dude who wrote and directed Clerks.

The fat dude is Kevin Smith. Go watch Dogma, I love that film.

I do have a question though, why is it that the Gay community always tries to promote that super hero's such as Superman, Batman, and such are gay?

Because they like big muscly men and they wish those characters were gay? I have to say I've never heard of anyone "promoting" superman et al as gay, although I'd bet that a google for "Superman slash" (with safe search turned off) would yield an awful lot of results.

It might also have something to do with the buttock-hugging tights. And I daresay there are gay men who can identify with the whole secret double-life thing that most superheroes lead. And the fact that although you see superheroes spending a lot of time with hot girls in spandex, they don't seem to get laid all that often. And most of the costumes are, let's face it, a bit camp.

Superman is NOT gay, and while the Adam West version of Batman might be open to interpitation, the most recent Batman movie clearly proves that Batman is not gay. (They got us on Robin though, theres no getting away from that one.)

Go and find yourself a copy of a book called "how to be a superhero" by Mark Leigh and Mike Levine - it is extremely funny, and explores the whole "Boy Wonder" thing quite humourously. Oh hell, here's the amazon link: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/156...lance&n=283155
(Not to be confused with "How to be a Superhero" by Dr Metropolis)

Spiderman is also not gay, strange and quite possibly a virgin, but most definatly not gay.

Peter Parker married the offensively out-of proportion Mary-Jane Parker nee Watson (After his first squeeze was thrown to her death off of a suspension bridge by his best friend in a goblin outfit, IIRC), so I very much doubt Spidey's a virgin. Of course, getting married proves nothing these days and some would say he's trying to prove something, marrying a barbie doll like that...

Now Captain America, he is sooooo gay:

[Hugh Manatee]

Anyone ever see the tick? They did a whole show about how Arthur(Tick's "Moth" Sidekick)hadn't told his parents about his new "Super" lifestyle choice. He "comes out" as a super hero to his parents and they commit him to a facility to "deprogram" his "delusions of super". The facility was run by Dave Folley, from News Radio and Celeb poker, who it turns out is closet super himself(he puts ofthe hero's costumes and locks his office and prances around in them). It was a frickin hilarious show that got fouled over by fox, only 1 season, but soooo wesome.

But yeah, between inuendo, pop psycologists, religious wack jobs, we're all flaming gay, manic, depressed, hellbound sickos who want to screw our mothers, kill our fathers, addicts who are "addicted" to stuff that is impossible to be addicted to, who need to be constantly doped up, but not with certain substances, jus the ones that cause impotence, anal leakage, stomach craps and liver failure that have 15 sylables in their names, all because we weren't spanked or spanked to much, or not hugged enough, or hugged to much, or hugged in a nono zone.

Sometimes a man in red and blue tights, a codpiece and a cape with a 13 year old ward, is just a man in red and blue tights, a codpiece and a cape witha 13 year old ward.....

[dogscoff]

*dogscoff awards Hugh the "Most entertaining rant of the month" trophy. [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/icon09.gif[/img]

[gregebowman]

As long as they avoid that academy movie or series that's been kicked around for years. I can picture it now. "Star Trek 90210" (shudder) No thanks. Even a hardcore trekkie like me wouldn't watch something like that. I hardly ever watched BH 90210 (and that was in the early years), and modern shows like The OC I generally avoid like the plague. Give me a good movie similar to ST 2 or 4, and I'll be happy. Just don't bring in the borgs, because I'm sick of them and I think they've been overdone. A good Federation/Romulan war would be good. Maybe they can even do the one before Kirk's time, which is where it looked like Enterprise might have been headed to if it had lasted another season or two.