|
|
|
|
 |

August 17th, 2006, 09:59 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Union, SC
Posts: 1,166
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: New info on SE:V at Malfador
Never run while cutting and pasting.
Those are words to live by.
How are things going, David? Haven't seen you in a while.
__________________
Caduceus
|

August 17th, 2006, 11:46 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New info on SE:V at Malfador
Those text files are certainly interesting reading. I'm a bit gutted that se5 has so few default ships per set though - it doesn't even have vanilla se4's 20, let alone the 40 of neostandard or 50+ that you see in some other sets. Will we be able to mod larger shipsets? Should we be working out the se5 neostandard now?
|

August 17th, 2006, 12:10 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: New info on SE:V at Malfador
Refer to this article. There are a number of vehicles (all units, freighters, carriers, etc) that have calls for alternate images (small/med/large sizes, typically), but most sets do not include them by default.
I think part of the reason why there are fewer models is that ships now have levels, so you don't really need as many distinct hull models.
|

August 17th, 2006, 05:32 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 962
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: New info on SE:V at Malfador
Quote:
Imperator Fyron said:
Refer to this article. There are a number of vehicles (all units, freighters, carriers, etc) that have calls for alternate images (small/med/large sizes, typically), but most sets do not include them by default.
I think part of the reason why there are fewer models is that ships now have levels, so you don't really need as many distinct hull models.
|
Fewer Models is not a good thing IMHO...other than having to make the shipsets of course then more models do suck...
|

August 17th, 2006, 07:13 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: New info on SE:V at Malfador
It is easy to propose the SE5 neostandard be "stock SE4" vehicle names.
And then add on the SE4 neostandard names if you want even more.
__________________
Things you want:
|

August 17th, 2006, 09:14 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: New info on SE:V at Malfador
Stock SE4 only has 3 vehicles that SE5 does not: escort, battlecruiser, and battlestation. SE5 in fact calls for many more models overall than stock SE4. 
|

August 17th, 2006, 09:25 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Union, SC
Posts: 1,166
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: New info on SE:V at Malfador
So frigate is the new escort? 
__________________
Caduceus
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|