What everyone hated about SE:IV

Ragnarok-X · #1 October 1st, 2006, 03:32 PM

Then again, some things cant be fixed by mods.

Artaud · #2 October 1st, 2006, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Ragnarok-X said:
Then again, some things cant be fixed by mods.

Quite true. I think also that one should not have to rely on a mod to "fix" certain things.

Which is why I won't be buying SEV any time soon.

Xrati · #3 October 1st, 2006, 05:26 PM

You can never please all of the people all of the time. With that in mind just keep an open mind on SEV, after all the original reviews on Star Wars in the opening days, had it as a Good Guys vs Bad Guys movie, nothing more. It turned out to be a lot more!

Suicide Junkie · #4 October 1st, 2006, 06:07 PM

People should also *not* chain themselves to "stock" unnessesarily. Its not like stock is the bible or anything.

Maybe Aaron intentionally made it weak to encourage people to customize the game?

Ragnarok-X · #5 October 1st, 2006, 06:29 PM

Just to get this straight, mods were one of the best things in computergame history to be developed, and comparing SEIV stock to stuff like Adamant or Devnull (+++) defintly adds a lot of playability. However, i think its quite to be forced to use mods in order to enjoy something. Mods should add a new twist, new flair to a game.

I for one am definily open-minded regarding mods, but face it, you cant mod a "broken" interface, nor can you change certain things. You can only change what is allowed to change, and that would be datafiles.

Suicide Junkie · #6 October 1st, 2006, 06:44 PM

Which is exactly why I don't care to bug Aaron about stock too much.
Let Aaron work on the things that only he can fix, and leave the actual datafiles to us.

If only he'd let us write "stock"...

Tim_Ward · #7 October 1st, 2006, 07:27 PM

Quote:

If only he'd let us write "stock"...

Not a bad idea.

Seriously, maybe it's time for Aaron to employ a few guys...

Devnullicus · #8 October 5th, 2006, 03:07 AM

Quote:

Tim_Ward said:

Quote:

If only he'd let us write "stock"...

Not a bad idea.

Seriously, maybe it's time for Aaron to employ a few guys...

Heh, if Aaron wanted to do some short-term contract outsourcing, I'd be happy to make some "stock" data files for SE5.

Hmmm, then again, my employer might have some issues with that since I already make computer games for a living. On the other hand, I suspect that if the opportunity arose, I could definitely talk my company into looking the other way

And, of course, if he wanted a programming partner for SE6, well... hey, I can't imagine many other games I'd rather work on

But I have a feeling that Aaron likes working alone. And I have to say I don't blame him! Making a game as a labor of love is very different than churning out games in teams of 100+ people!

Artaud · #9 October 1st, 2006, 09:27 PM

Quote:

Suicide Junkie said:
If only he'd let us write "stock"...

I agree. The one-man development shop thing can only do so much. Development by committee is also not good, but many of the issues being brought up here as SEV "negatives" appear to have been brought up by the beta testers to Aaron. For whatever reason, he did not or could not act upon their suggestions.

Most of the things I see being brought up as "bugs" or irritants are really things that are rather obvious.

Kamog · #10 October 2nd, 2006, 12:23 AM

Those were the good old days. When the first version 0.51 demo for SEIV came out, the A.I.'s were very weak and they didn't create fleets, so ships came through warp points one by one and attacked one by one. It was too easy to beat the A.I.'s and it quickly got boring.

SEV will be fixed and improved over time, just like SEIV did.